Intro made in Adobe After Effects

Automotive Design, Industrial Design, Illustration, Adobe Photoshop

Shop XTRM Ply SoundSafe Acoustic Barrier Graphite PVC Acoustical Sound Absorbing Roll 120-in x 54-in at Lowe's.com. XTRM Ply SoundSafe (45 SQ FT fire rated) is specifically designed to act as an acoustic barrier, reducing noise transmission through floors, walls and

Cover: Christian Hosoi – Method Air Photo: Mofo Inside: Mission: Europa Inside this issue: Mission: EuropaCover: Christian Hosoi – Method Air. Photo:...

Shop our full collection of P&Co menswear, from our latest range of custom styles to our classic best-selling designs.

Particle Orb Animation from Xtrm-Effects.http://www.wix.com/wischmeister/xtrm-effects

Article by Jeff Valliere Ron Hill Reverence (£135, €161.99, US$180.89) Introduction to the Ron Hill brand:  Who was Ron Hill?  I had never heard the name or of the brand before being approached to review these shoes.  The description sent to us below sums it up best.  I will also note that Ron Hill holds the world record run streak of 19,032 days! ‘Dr Ron Hill MBE founded the brand in September 1970, five months after becoming the first Briton to win the Boston Marathon in a record time of 2:10:30. His sole purpose: to produce kit that kept him winning. Dr Ron gained a PhD in Textile Chemistry, from the University of Manchester and through alchemy and his art as a runner, began to rethink the fly-by-night running kit of the time. After winning the Commonwealth Games in 1970 he developed the ‘side-split short’ which famously become the Freedom Short and the Mesh Vest - both having accompanied him to his greatest victories on the road. Half a century ago, Dr Ron’s innovations transformed the world of running clothing, we want to continue this journey with running footwear, allowing runners to run every day in comfort and invest in a product that truly performs how they require it to. Our running shoes have been designed by runners and assisted by experts in the field of developing and manufacturing performance trainers. We have also leant on our 50 years of passion and knowhow, inspired by Dr Ron, and guided by feedback from our test team of athletes to create our first footwear collection. Everything that has gone into our running shoe collection has resulted in footwear fit for purpose.’ Introduction to the shoe:  The Reverence is a mountain running/fell shoe designed in the English Lake District to take on the roughest, wettest, muddiest terrain with confidence.  They feature a “True Fit” design to allow for the big toe to splay and give enough room to not feel confined on all day adventures and a Matryx upper to provide very good security, durability and protection.   The outsole for me is the star of the show, featuring super aggressive 7mm lugs made of Michelin’s OCX3 compound (Outdoor Compound Extreme 3), a sticky rubber that provides superb grip on all surfaces and especially in wet challenging conditions. Pros:  Traction (7mm lugs and Michelin OCX3 rubber are an amazing combo!), foothold, low to ground stable feel, protection, quality build Cons: Weight, less than energetic midsole, laces are thin and come untied easily (unless you tie really tight triple knot, then is fine) Most Comparable Shoes  Inov-8 Mudtalon Speed (RTR Review) VJ XTRM 2 (RTR Review) Saucony Peregrine (RTR Review) Topo MTN Racer 3 (RTR Review) Stats Spec Weight: US men's size 9 - 11.3 oz / 320 g Sample Weight: US men’s size 10 - 12.1 oz / 343 g US  Stack Height: men’s  28mm heel /  23mm forefoot ( 5mm drop spec)  Platform Width: 88mm heel / 87mm midfoot / 115mm forefoot  £135, €161.99, US$180.89. Available at Ron Hill HERE & at our partner SportsShoes.com HERE First Impressions, Fit and Upper I’ll admit that I was initially drawn to the 7mm lugs, which, for Colorado, are typically overkill for most trails and conditions, however, I often like to run through challenging terrain and conditions, so when I do, it is really nice to have that extra bite.  I was also headed to Kauai and was looking forward to how they would perform in truly wet, muddy, challenging conditions.  Out of the box, I am of course impressed with the massive, aggressive and deep lugs, dominating the look and overall vibe of the shoe.  Upon first putting them on, I was not particularly impressed with the comfort, as the upper felt somewhat thick and stiff and getting the burrito style wrap over tongue and lacing situated took some practice and the laces are particularly thin.  The Reverence is also surprisingly heavy and dense feeling, at over 12 oz. in my US men’s size 10.  This feels even more heavy after just recently reviewing the (to be compared) Inov-8 Mudtalon Speed, which in the same size weighs nearly 3 ounces less (though admittedly not as protective or robust of a shoe overall).   The upper is made of the increasingly popular and super functional Matryx micro fabric that is manufactured in France for Ron Hill, complete with Kevlar reinforcements to give additional lockdown and support.  The Matryx upper is very protective and durable, though perhaps not the lightest or most breathable, but such are the trade offs. There is not really a tongue, but instead a wrap over, burrito style fold over providing a cradled fit around the midfoot.  Lacing is very secure, but it does take a bit of work to get into these shoes, particularly to set the lower flap so that it is not folded over or bunched up internally.  I have found the laces to be a little tricky and while I can achieve very secure snugness, they are spaghetti noodle thin and seem to come untied easily unless you really snug up tight double or even triple knots (then they can be a challenge to untie once they are set after a run). The toe bumper is very substantial and protective. The heel counter is semi flexible and sturdy, while the heel collar is moderately padded.  I found the collar to be a bit stiff at first, but it has really broken in nicely over time. Fit is true to size, with a secure heel, very secure midfoot and a toe box with just enough room for splay and all day comfort, yet still providing confidence inspiring control. The upper is not super airy, but that is good for this shoe, as it does not allow much for dirt, sand, or mud to penetrate, yet it drains of water fairly well (though the padded area will retain wetness for some time). Midsole & Platform The midsole consists of a dual density EVA called Duo Pro, where the top layer softer foam to provide a comfortable cushioned feeling ride for long durations, while the bottom layer is firmer to provide stability on rough terrain.   I find the midsole and ride of the shoe to be appropriate for the shoes intended use on rugged, varied terrain, as it is very stable, predictable and protective.  At first I found the shoe to feel a bit stiff and clunky overall, the upper, combined with the midsole, but I found that after a few runs, the feel was softer and more forgiving.  The midsole does not however offer much in the way of bounce, response or energy and is not notably cushy. Outsole As I said in the introduction, the outsole for me is the star of the show, featuring super aggressive 7mm lugs made of Michelin’s OCX3 compound (Outdoor Compound Extreme 3), a sticky rubber that provides superb grip on all surfaces and especially in wet challenging conditions.   I received the Reverence on the eve of a weeklong vacation to Kauai and found them to be the perfect shoe for the trip, as parts of the island receive an average of 450 inches / 1140 cm of rain  per year. The trails were guaranteed to be wet, muddy and slippery!  The mud there varied quite a bit, from soupy mush, to clumpy muck, to hard pack mud as slick as ice.   The Reverence performed about as well as any shoe could in such challenging conditions, with the Michelin sticky rubber providing very good wet traction and the 7mm lugs biting very well.   As far as clearing mud out of the tread, it really depends on the consistency of the mud, where softer more viscous mud would clear fine, but sticky clay like mud would just pack the gaps and stay there.   Back in Colorado, I was able to test them in wet spring snow, frozen snow, wet rock, steep loose off trail, wet/dry slabs and rocky technical trails and traction was top notch in all of those circumstances.  Durability is proving to be very good, with really no visible wear thus far. Ride, Conclusions and Recommendations Jeff: The ride is stable, predictable and protective, but not at all responsive or inspiring for pushing hard and going fast (unless it is a very technical downhill).   I’ll admit that at first I was somewhat unsure of the Reverence given the weight, stiff feel and uninspiring midsole, but as I broke them in and they softened up (also getting them very wet with mud and creek crossings every day), I found them to be great for negotiating the very slick and technical trails of Kauai, either mellow to moderate runs, or all day hikes.  The midsole also softened up some over time and while not a pillowy cushioned shoe, I do not find them to be harsh or abusive either and are adequate for their intended purpose.   So what are the Reverence best for and how will I use them going forward?  Despite the weight, or perhaps in part because of it, they are very protective under foot, as well as the from the upper, being very well protected from bumps and bangs while running or hiking in the most technical terrain, talus, rough creek crossings, etc…  They have a very stable and low to the ground feeling, as well as are consistently wide underfoot throughout, offering a stable platform and a lot of surface area, with good proprioception.  Outside of Kauai, I will run the Reverence for longer, slower days on the most technical terrain where protection, security, stability and all around traction (especially if loose or muddy) are paramount. Jeff V’s Score: 9.2/10 Ride: 8.5, Fit: 9.25, Value: 9.5, Style: 8.5, Traction: 10, Rock Protection: 9 😊😊😊 Comparisons Index to all RTR reviews: HERE Roadtrailrun  Ron Hill Freedom (RTR Review soon) The Freedom has a similar construction with more stack height at 32/27 and 4mm instead of 7mm lugs. Inov-8 Mudtalon Speed (RTR Review) Quite similar in many ways with massive sticky rubber lugs and a Fell shoe look, the Mudtalon has even more pronounced 8mm lugs.  The Mudtalon is narrower and more minimal and pared down, resulting in a nearly 3 oz lower weight in my US Men’s size 10.  They are much faster and more agile than the Reverence, and superior for going uphill and for faster paces.  The upper is thinner and retains less water than the Reverence (though the Reverence does drain well too).  For faster running and shorter distances, the Mudtalon is a better pick, but for slower speeds, longer days where more protection (upper and under foot), the Reverence is a better choice. VJ XTRM 2 (RTR Review) The VJ is much lighter, more agile and a quicker shoe overall, with 6mm lugs and great traction, but can feel a bit thin underfoot, so it is best for shorter, faster runs, where the Reverence is best for longer days, slower paces and where you need more protection. Saucony Peregrine (RTR Review) Again, the Peregrine is significantly lighter, with a very well cushioned feel, a lively midsole, comfortable fit and pretty good traction.  The Peregrine has a less stable feel than the Reverence despite both having about the same stack. The Reverence is wider and has a more planted feel in technical terrain and has superior traction. Topo MTN Racer 3 (RTR Review) The MTN Racer 3 is lighter, is softer and has more cushioning, but a similarly stable feel.  While the MTN Racer 3 has very good traction, the Reverence is superior in that department.  The Topo is better for faster running on just about any terrain and for longer distances as it has more cushioning and a wider toe box, the Reverence is better for much more technical terrain and loose muddy conditions. Reverence and Freedom are available at Ron Hill HERE  SportsShoes.com HERE Tester Profiles Jeff Valliere loves to run and explore the mountains of Colorado, the steeper and more technical the better. He has summited all of the 14ers in the state and can be found on mountain trails daily, no matter the weather, season, conditions or whether there is daylight or not.  On the side he loves to ski (all forms) bike and hike, often with his family, as he introduces his 12 year old daughters to the outdoors. Jeff was born and raised in New Hampshire, but has called Colorado home for over 25 years. He is 5’9” and 145 lbs. Samples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased via shopping links in this article. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Comments and Questions Welcome Below! Please let us know mileage, paces, race distances, and current preferred shoes RoadTrailRun Official Store Custom Fractel Caps and Bucket Hats Cap:$39                                                             Bucket:$49 Limited Release! SHOP HERE RUNNING WAREHOUSE US Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE 2 Day Shipping EASY No Sweat Returns EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Europe only: use RTR code RTR5ALL for 5% off all products, even sale products  AUSTRALIA Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FLEET FEET Men's & Women's SHOP HERE REI  Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE BACKCOUNTRY Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE ROADRUNNERSPORTS Men's and Women's SHOP HERE TOP4RUNNING EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Use RTR code RTRTOP4 for 5% off all products, even sale products SPORTSSHOES.COM UK/EU SHOP HERE Use our code RTR235 for 5% off all products NEW BALANCE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE SAUCONY Men's and Women's SHOP HERE SALOMON RUNNING Men's and Women's SHOP HERE BROOKS RUNNING Men's and Women's SHOP HERE MARATHON SPORTS BOSTON Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE MOOSEJAW Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE HOLABIRD SPORTS Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE Shipping on most orders over $40 WATCH OUR YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE ROADTRAILRUN CHANNEL Find all RoadTrailRun reviews at our index page HERE  Google "roadtrailrun Shoe Name" and you can be quite sure to find just about any run shoe over the last 10 years Enjoyed this post? Never miss out on future posts by Following RoadTrailRun News Feed Please Like and Follow RoadTrailRun Facebook: RoadTrailRun.com  Instagram: @roadtrailrun You Tube: @RoadTrailRun

Article by Jeff Valliere and Mike Postaski Inov-8 Trailyfly ($150) Introduction Jeff V:  The Inov-8 Trailfly is an all new model from Inov 8, with a new foot shape design for all day comfort, yet with great security and with soft yet stable cushioning on a full stack height of  29mm heel / 23mm forefoot which is enhanced by a Boomerang TPU footbed and very good traction. It is a great all around and versatile shoe, equally at home running door to trail, buffed trails and dirt roads, and all the way up the mountain into more technical terrain.   They make for a great daily trainer that, while not the fastest shoe out there, can easily handle fast running on just about any trail.  In addition to having a more generous fit foot shape design, they come in 2 widths, standard and wide. Pros:  Comfort, roomy yet secure fit (and width options), cushion, traction, protection, trail feel - Jeff V Full coverage, yet flexible outsole Mike P Comfortable upper, especially around tongue area Mike P Width options Mike P New Boomerang insole is lighter and more flexible Mike P Cons:  Styling - Jeff V Slight loss of flex around midfoot Mike P Heel hold could be better, could use some inner bolsters Mike P/Jeff V Most comparable shoes Inov-8 TerraUltra G270 Inov-8 TrailFly Speed Topo MTN Racer 3 VJ XTRM 2 Altra Timp 5 Salomon Genesis Stats Approx. Weight: 10.2 oz  / 289g (US9) Samples: men’s  10.6oz /302g US 10, 10.4 oz / 294g US 9.5 Stack Height: men’s 29mm heel / 23mm forefoot ( 6mm drop spec)  Platform Width: 85mm heel / 62mm midfoot / 112mm forefoot $150 Available now First Impressions, Fit and Upper Jeff V:  I have tested/reviewed a few pairs of Inov 8 shoes in the past and while they are fine shoes with good grip and secure uppers, they have never really landed for me for some reason.   Inov-8 have really upped their game though this year with several new models such as the Mudtalon Speed (RTR Review), the TrailFly and the TrailFly Speed.   With a 29/23 stack, it is by no means a max cushion shoe, but has ample cushioning for long days on the trail.  Notable is the foot shape design, such as Topo and Altra have.  In my opinion it is much more functionally closer to Topo, where there is ample room in the toe box for overall comfort, splay and swelling, yet still provides a very good foothold, even in technical terrain. Fit is overall true to size, with very good hold in the heel and midfoot and as mentioned above, there is a wider toe box to allow for some wiggle room, yet the upper remains very secure.  I only notice a slight bit of waver when running steep off camber sidehill situations or when running very fast in technical terrain, but it is reasonably manageable.  T he Trailfly comes in standard and wide fit, where for my narrow, low volume foot, I went with the standard fit which is perfect. The single piece Air Mesh upper is breathable, well protected and comfortable with “Met Cradle” overly strips providing added an extra supportive locked in feel. The toe bumper is thick and protective, warding off any stubs and bumps. The heel collar is well padded and the heel counter is semi flexible, generally secure and supportive, but could use a little more structure. The tongue is well padded and gusseted as well. Mike P: I haven’t run in an Inov-8 shoe in a while, but I did love the Terraultra G 270 (now called Trailfly G270) when it first came out. This shoe, as well as the new TrailFly Speed (RTR Review soon), seems to be something of an iteration of that G 270. The new TrailFly notably incorporates a 6mm drop, which does feel noticeable in comparison to the lower 4mm of the TrailFly Speed and the zero drop of the older G 270. I have found in the past that Inov-8’s sizing tends to run a bit small/short. I’ve typically run in size US 10.0 for Inov-8 but I received the TrailFly in US 9.5.  It definitely runs short - my toes are pretty jammed up in the front, even with my most ultrathin socks. It’s passable for testing, but just so. On flats and inclines they’re ok, but any type of descent and they’re just too short up front for me. I would need a US 10.0 to make them runnable beyond testing.  As far as the new Standard/Wide fit, it’s hard for me to get a read on it with the length not being correct for me. I do have both the TrailFly and the TrailFly Speed in Wide fit. The Wide fit is more noticeable in the TrailFly Speed - pretty much on par with a Topo and almost Altra-wide. I like the fit for comfort, but if I wanted a more dialed in fit for added security, I think the Standard fit would work better for me at a US10 . I think having the width option is great and should accommodate almost all foot sizes. That being said, Jeff V will take the lead on this review, and I’ll focus more on the comparison aspect between the two new models in our upcoming TrailFly Speed review. Midsole & Platform Jeff V:  The new Powerflow Pro foam midsole is light, well cushioned and responsive, providing a quick, smooth ride with very good protection and overall performance on varied terrain.  I do not find the Trailfly to necessarily inspire speedy runs, but they can easily get up and go when you ask them to and perform very well at any speed and are a quite versatile everyday trainer.   Adding to the cushioning and comfort is a new, lighter version of the 6mm Boomerang footbed that “features hundreds of expanded TPU beads that compress and spring back for more energy return and cushioning”.   Also in the mix for added protection is a flexible fingered Meta Shank rock plate that allows the feet to move naturally and experience a nice level of trail feel.  Whether I am running my daily 60-90 minute run, or getting out for a full day of running or hiking, the Trailfly can handle just about any duration run without feeling the least bit beat up. Mike P: The new Boomerang insole is a standout feature of the new TrailFly. It has actually been redesigned and improved from the previous/original Boomerang. It’s now both lighter and more flexible. I weighed them at 56g/pair for my TrailFly Speed insoles (US 10.0, wide). I weigh 60g/pair for a set of my old Boomerang insoles (US 10.0, regular). It doesn’t seem like much, but I do notice the difference in weight.  [New - left, Old - right] Either the beads or possibly the filler material seems to be lighter. They are also more flexible, which is also noticeable on the run. I’ve swapped my original Boomerangs into many shoes, and there was alway some loss of flex when using those. This newer insole should alleviate or possibly eliminate that consideration. [Old Boomerang insole on top of newer, wide version Boomerang - the new insole on the bottom is 2g lighter despite being larger in volume] I like the feel of the new Powerflow Pro foam. As Jeff says, it doesn’t “feel” super speedy, but it also doesn’t feel slow or mushy either. It falls somewhere in the middle in terms of responsiveness, and the shoe definitely feels more protective underfoot than both the G 270 and the TrailFly Speed. I never feel like I’m bottoming out in the midsole foam, which is something I felt with the G270.  I don’t know what the exact orientation of the “Meta Shank” rock plate is but it is fingered up front to follow the toe bones.  It does not feel like a thick plate, and it also doesn’t feel stiff under the midfoot. If anything, I noticed some stiffness under the arch of the foot, more towards the heel area. When landing on that spot I felt some instability at times, whereas I had better flex and feel under the forefoot.  Outsole Jeff V:  The outsole features Inov 8’s Graphene Grip sticky rubber compound with  4mm chevron shaped directional lugs.  Traction has been superb on all terrain and conditions I have run on, from wet to dry, sandy, muddy, snowy, frozen snow, Utah sandstone, scrambling, etc…  Even when running loose, steep off trail, they grab quite well. The lugs are still low profile and broad enough to perform well on the road, making them a versatile road to trail to mountaintops sort of shoe.   The Meta Flex groove up front helps with flexibility on technical terrain and also help with propulsion at toe off.  Durability of the outsole is proving to be above average so far. Mike P: Durability has been proven with Inov-8 graphene outsoles. I put 395 miles on my first pair of G 270’s and the outsole was still in good shape, while the midsole was fully packed out. The TrailFly outsole is full coverage, which is really great for protection. Yet the orientation of the lugs allows for plenty of flex, especially under the forefoot.  The Meta Flex groove that spans across the entire forefoot does a good job of maintaining a smooth ride, even though there are no breaks in the rubber underfoot.  Ride, Conclusions and Recommendations Jeff V:  I’ll be honest that my first impressions were not overwhelming, perhaps because of past mediocre experiences and they are admittedly not a shoe that you put on and you are just itching to go fast in them.  However, I was surprised on the first run how much I liked them and as I ran in them, I liked them more and more, to the point where testing or not, I will be reaching for them regularly for my daily runs. The Trailfly provides a smooth, lively and predictable well protected ride on a wide variety of terrain, from door to trail to the high mountains.   While I do not necessarily need, or seek out a specifically “foot shaped” shoe, I appreciate the added room and comfort for most day to day training on the trails, as they are very secure overall with only a little bit of waver when side hilling steep terrain or at fast speeds in very technical terrain.  The Trailfly is an excellent day to day trainer or even racer for some and I would consider it to be versatile enough if you are looking for a one shoe quiver. Jeff V’s Score: 9.4/10 Ride: 9.5, Fit: 9.5, Value: 9.5, Style: 8, Traction: 9.5, Rock Protection: 9.5 😊😊😊😊😊 Mike P: When thinking about the ride of the shoe, I can’t help but think that it feels like a beefed up G 270. The G270 is more dynamic, firmer and responsive, mostly due to the fact that it’s lower to the ground and also zero drop. With that shoe, over time, I felt like the zero drop was a bit too much of a strain, and also the insole packed out after a while and it felt thin under the forefoot. This flavor of TrailFly alleviates both of those issues. There’s more stack at 29/23mm, and the 6mm drop is smoother and doesn’t strain the lower legs. There’s noticeably more cushion underfoot, especially for me, under the forefoot. The Powerflow Pro foam feels similar to Altra’s EGO Max - somewhat responsive, somewhat lightweight, but not overly dynamic in character.  Overall the ride feels smooth, as opposed to dynamic and agile. Here again I defer to Jeff for his technical assessment, as my incorrect sizing didn’t allow me to push them too much. If I had to guess at true, ideal sizing for me - I’d go with US 10.0 regular fit.  They don’t feel as stable as they could be - as mentioned earlier, I detect a hint of stiffness under the midfoot/front of heel. If I had to pinpoint an instability point under the shoe - that would be the area. But If you can manage solid forefoot placements, you’re good to go, as there’s plenty of flex up front and no lateral instability. Another area that could be improved is the heel area - the interior is pretty vertical, without any real bolsters around the heel. The fit of the shoe does manage to keep the heel seated, but it seems to rely on pressing the heel into the rear of the shoe as opposed to holding the heel down. I think loosening up this pressure and perhaps adding some interior padding would really round out the comfort level of the shoe. This is a solid all-around shoe from Inov-8. For me, it hits squarely in that middle ground of everyday training - not overly cushioned, and not overly thin. It has some range for quicker runs, and also to go a bit longer if needed. Keep an eye out for our review of the TrailFly’s sibling - TrailFly Speed. I’ll take a more comparative angle in that review. Mike P’s Score:  8.88 / 10 Ride: 8 - Smooth and comfortable, but nothing really stands out Fit: 9 - Properly sized, you should be able to dial in a good length/width combo Value: 9.5 - Outsole no problem, midsole should hold up longer Style: 9 - I like the gradient look, and overall color scheme  Traction: 9.5 - Inov-8 knows what they’re doing here Rock Protection: 9.5 - Really good and still flexible  Smiles 😊😊😊 9 Comparisons Index to all RTR reviews: HERE  Inov-8 TrailFly Speed (RTR Review soon) Mike P (10.0): Stay tuned for our upcoming review. The Speed flavor is noticeably closer to the ground, and seems like it has an even wider fit. It’s listed at a 4mm drop, but rides almost like a zero drop shoe. It’s very different from this TrailFly - it feels much more minimal. Inov-8 Trailfly G 270 (RTR Review) Mike P (10.0): The TrailFly is a beefed up version of this shoe. It loses some dynamic feel, but adds noticeable cushion, drop, and protection. The upper is also better and more comfortable. The G 270 had some rigid edges around the ankle collar, andthe tongue was a bit thin. They leaned a bit more into the comfort side of the spectrum with the TrailFly. The wide fit of the TrailFly is wider than what they called the “wide” fit of the G 270. If you want to dial it in a bit, you can pick the Standard fit. Topo MTN Racer 3: (RTR Review) Jeff V:  This is the first and most obvious comparison that comes to mind for me.  Both shoes are about the same weight, same price and of course both have a more foot shaped design that is not as extreme as Altra, but functionally useful and welcome while providing good foothold and security.  The Topo, at a few grams less even, has 4mm more stack height and feels a bit more lively to me, while the Trailfly has a bit better ground feel and stability, while still providing excellent protection.  Traction is comparable.   Mike P: This shoe also came to mind for me, the most obvious difference is that the Topo feels much softer underfoot. It also seems to be more flexible throughout, especially under the midfoot. TrailFly gets a big edge with its new Boomerang insole - it gives the shoe a better connection to the ground. Topo introduced a TPU insole of their own in the upcoming Pursuit 2, so I hope they will do the same with the next MTN Racer.  Salomon Genesis: (RTR Review) Jeff V:  Again, close in stack height and the same price, the Genesis is lighter with a quicker, more dynamic ride and a more substantial, well cushioned/protective feel.  The Genesis has more substantial lugs, while the Trailfly with Graphene grip compound has slightly better grip overall. Mike P: Agree with Jeff - the Genesis is overall a better shoe. The cushioning feels softer, yet also more dynamic. I did find them slightly tapered up front in the toebox, so that’s a consideration if you’re thinking about Inov-8’s wide fit. Edge to the TrailFly in traction and durability, but the Genesis is still pretty good in that department. Inov8 Mudtalon Speed: (RTR Review) Jeff V: The Mudtalon is lighter and more stripped down, narrower, with a lower stack and a thin upper that does not retain water.  Both are foot shaped, but it is much more apparent in the Trailfly than the Mudtalon and both come in standard and wide options.  Beyond those major differences, the Mudtalon has incredibly aggressive 7mm lugs that are superior (to any shoe) in loose junk, mud and soft snow. Brooks Cascadia 17: (RTR Review) Jeff V:  The Cascadia is a great all around, do everything shoe, with more cushioning and protection underfoot, but with not as good ground feel. The wider toe box of the Trailfly is welcome on longer days or for those with wider feet.  The Cascadia has been creeping up in weight (12oz for my US M10) and this is very noticeable with the Trailfly at a considerably lighter 10.6oz /302g US 10 .  Trailfly has superior traction and outsole durability. Saucony Peregrine 13:  (RTR Review) Jeff V:  Close in stack height, weight and price, so another good comparison.  The Trailfly has better ground feel and flexibility and better sticky rubber for overall better grip, and despite the slightly more aggressive lugs the Peregrine is known for. This said the  Peregrine with a more secure fit, feels more competent in technical terrain, off trail, rock hopping, etc… Altra Timp 5 (RTR Review) Mike P (9.5): The shape of these shoes is very similar, but note the sizing difference here. My Timp 5’s are perfectly true to size, but I’m totally jammed up in the same US 9.5 for the TrailFly. I would need a 10.0 in the TrailFly for an equivalent fit. The Altra is slightly wider, but not that much. The TrailFly’s upper material is more flexible and breathable, and holds just as well. The Altra’s foam feels more dynamic, while the TrailFly feels vaguely similar, but not as good. Altra of course is zero drop, so if you’re looking for a Timp-type feel with a drop, the TrailFly is probably your best bet.  VJ XTRM 2 (RTR Review) Mike P (10.5): Putting this one at the end, since the comp is not as close as the others above. The VJ is much narrower in the upper, and also narrower on the ground, allowing for more foot precise placements in technical terrain. It’s firmer underfoot with a bit of a stiff ride and flex. The TrailFly is much smoother - better on trail, while the XTRM is of course better in “extreme” off-trail situations. The Inov-8 Trailfly  and Trailfly Speed available now at Inov-8  & at our partner   SPORTSSHOES.COM  SHOP HERE Use our code RTR235 for 5% off all products Tester Profiles Jeff Valliere loves to run and explore the mountains of Colorado, the steeper and more technical the better. He has summited all of the 14ers in the state and can be found on mountain trails daily, no matter the weather, season, conditions or whether there is daylight or not.  On the side he loves to ski (all forms) bike and hike, often with his family, as he introduces his 12 year old daughters to the outdoors. Jeff was born and raised in New Hampshire, but has called Colorado home for over 25 years. He is 5’9” and 145 lbs. Mike Postaski currently focuses on long mountainous ultras - anywhere from 50K up to his favorite - 100M. 5'10", 138 lbs, midfoot/forefoot striker - he typically averages 70 mpw (mostly on trails), ramping up to 100+ mpw during race buildups. A recent 2:39 road marathoner, his easy running pace ranges from 7:30 - 9:00/mi. From 2022-23 Mike has won the Standhope 100M, IMTUF 100M, and Scout Mountain 100M trail ultras. He also set a CR of 123.74M at the Pulse Endurance Runs 24H and completed the Boise Trails Challenge on foot in 3 days 13 hours, besting the previous record by 7 hours. Mike's shoe preferences lean towards firmer, dense cushioning, and shoes with narrower profiles. He prefers extra forefoot space, especially for long ultras, and he strongly dislikes pointy toe boxes. Samples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased via shopping links in this article. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Comments and Questions Welcome Below! Please let us know mileage, paces, race distances, and current preferred shoes RoadTrailRun Official Store Custom Fractel Caps and Bucket Hats Cap:$39                                                             Bucket:$49 Limited Release! SHOP HERE RUNNING WAREHOUSE US Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE 2 Day Shipping EASY No Sweat Returns EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Europe only: use RTR code RTR5ALL for 5% off all products, even sale products  AUSTRALIA Men's & Women's SHOP HERE ROADRUNNERSPORTS Men's and Women's SHOP HERE FLEET FEET Men's & Women's SHOP HERE REI  Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE BACKCOUNTRY Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE TOP4RUNNING EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Use RTR code RTRTOP4 for 5% off all products, even sale products MARATHON SPORTS BOSTON Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE MOOSEJAW Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE HOLABIRD SPORTS Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE Shipping on most orders over $40 AMAZON   Men's & Women's SHOP HERE WATCH OUR YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE ROADTRAILRUN CHANNEL Find all RoadTrailRun reviews at our index page HERE  Google "roadtrailrun Shoe Name" and you can be quite sure to find just about any run shoe over the last 10 years Enjoyed this post? Never miss out on future posts by Following RoadTrailRun News Feed Please Like and Follow RoadTrailRun Facebook: RoadTrailRun.com  Instagram: @roadtrailrun You Tube: @RoadTrailRun

" Alufelgen Felgen passend für MG (Saic) ZS EV ZS1, SZS1, MZS1 WHEELWORLD WH39 8J x 18 5/112 ET 40 Dark Gunmetal Hochglanzpoliert Alufelgen 18 Zoll passend für MG (Saic) ZS EV, Typ ZS1, SZS1, MZS1 inklusive ABE / TüV-Gutachten fahrzeugbezogen. Gerne auch vorab per Mail. Renommierter Hersteller. Rechnung mit ausgewiesener MwSt. 24 Monate gesetzliche Gewährleistung Persönliche und telefonische Beratung unseres Teams, auch nach dem Kauf Hochwertige Aluminiumfelgen mit Mehrschichtlackierung WHEELWORLD WH39 8J x 18 5/112 ET 40 Dark Gunmetal Hochglanzpoliert passend für folgende Fahrzeuge: Hersteller Typ Motorisierung KW / PS ccm Baujahr MG ZS EV 75KW 75 / 102 0 ab 2022/02 bis 2023/12 MG ZS EV 68KW 68 / 92 0 ab 2022/02 bis 2023/12 Zugelassene Reifendimensionen (Auszug aus dem TüV-Dokument): KW-Bereich Reifengröße ABE**/Tüv* (Bemerkung) 68-75 215/45R18 ABE**  68-75 225/45R18 ABE**  68-75 235/40R18 ABE**  68-75 245/40R18 TUEV*  ABE** Felgen als auch Reifen sind mit einer allgemeinen Betriebserlaubnis für Ihr Fahrzeug 205325721467 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/mBEAAeSwMINnwzw1/s-l1600.jpg https://www.ebay.de/itm/205325721467?norover=1&siteid=77&mkevt=1&mkcid=16&chn=psoc 640.0 EUR 4x Alufelgen Wheelworld Wh39 Für Mg (saic) Zs Ev Zs1, Szs1, Mzs1 18 Zoll Felgen Auto & Motorrad > Teile > Autoteile & Zubehör > Autoreifen & Felgen > Felgen 008 new Wheelworld in stock Keine Designvorlage 🚗 Perfekte Passform & Top-Qualität BOSCH AEROECO Scheibenwischer + GRATIS: 50ml Scheibenwischwasser Konzentrat (ergibt 5 Liter Scheiben Reiniger) 🚘 Kompatibilität / Passend für: 🔧 Fahrzeugmarke/Modell:  Renault Twingo II Bj. 2007-2014 🔧 Fahrerseite:AE600 = 60 cm 🔧 Beifahrerseite: AE400 = 40 cm 🔧 Hinten: X ❗ Bitte überprüfen Sie vor dem Kauf die oben angegebenen Fahrzeugdaten sorgfältig! 🌟 Warum BOSCH AeroEco? Erleben Sie die perfekte Kombination aus Qualität und Leistung mit den BOSCH AeroEco Scheibenwischern: 🔧 Einfache Montage: 🚗 Fahrzeugspezifischer Adapter für eine präzise Passform 🚗 Installation in Sekunden: Einhängen, einrasten, losfahren! 🚗 Vormontierter Universaladapter für schnelle Nachrüstung ⏳ Längere Lebensdauer: Hält bis zu 700.000 Wischzyklen durch gleichmäßige Kraftverteilung – für eine deutlich längere Lebensdauer als bei herkömmlichen Wischern. 🔍 Kristallklare Sicht: Perfekte Reinigung an jedem Punkt der Scheibe dank Hightech-Evodium-Federschiene und Power Prot 286254271064 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/JGgAAOSw92dnyyHV/s-l1600.jpg https://www.ebay.de/itm/286254271064?norover=1&siteid=77&mkevt=1&mkcid=16&chn=psoc 40.99 EUR Bosch Scheibenwischer Set Für Renault Twingo Ii 2007-2014 + Scheiben Reiniger Auto & Motorrad > Teile > Autoteile & Zubehör > Scheiben- & Scheinwerferreinigung > Wischerblätter & -gummi 008 new XTRM-CAR in stock Spezifikation: 100% Brandneu mit hoher Qualität Material: ICE SILD Color: ALS PICTION SIZE: M--XL Package enthalten: 1 x Unterwäsche Please: 1. Aufgrund des unterschiedlichen Monitors und des leichten Effekts kann die tatsächliche Farbe eine leichte Unterscheidung von der Bildfarbe. 2. Bitte erlauben Sie, dass 2--3 cm aufgrund der manuellen Messung variieren. 3. Die asiatische Größe ist kleiner als die Euusuk --Größe. Vergleichen Sie bitte die Detailgrößen mit Ihren vor dem Kauf Preview: 1. We only accept payment via PayPal, other payment is not acceptable. 2. If you don’t have PayPal account, please register through https://www.paypal.com before you bid our items. 3. Please make sure your shipping address is the same of your eBay address before you pay. We will not be responsible for such a case if you change you shipping address as we have shipped your items out. 1. We only ship to confirmed eBay address, your eBay address must match your Shipping address. 2. All items are available for shipping within 1-10 356403834844 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/LzkAAOSwjr1mzYP3/s-l1600.jpg https://www.ebay.de/itm/356403834844?norover=1&siteid=77&mkevt=1&mkcid=16&chn=psoc 3.86 EUR 1pcs Seamless Slik Women Panties Ultral Thin Briefs Elastic Breathable 7a Bri^>d Sport > Fitness & Jogging > Bekleidung > Kinder & Jugend > Shorts & Radlerhosen 009 new Sportartikel > Fitness > Schaumroller-Zubehör Markenlos in stock Profiline2011  Die Profis für Car-Truck-Bus Ersatz-und Zubehörteile      Artikelnummer - part number: 049 100 113   Beschreibung - description:  Spannrolle Umlenkrolle Führungsrolle Riemenführung - pulley for belts   Maße - Dimensions: Durchmesser Außen = 74mm                                    Durchmesser Innen = 20mm                                    Breite = 38mm   Ausführung Rolle: Kunststoff plan - plastic plane)   Verwendung: pf.Volvo Truck FH12, FM12, F12, FL12, NH12                         pf.Volvo Bus B12B, 8500, 8700, 9700 173898266927 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/HhIAAOSwkhtc1FHt/s-l1600.jpg https://www.ebay.de/itm/173898266927?norover=1&siteid=77&mkevt=1&mkcid=16&chn=psoc 10.95 EUR Spannrolle Umlenkrolle Führungsrolle Riemenführung Für Volvo Truck F Fh Fm Bus Auto & Motorrad > Teile > Autoteile & Zubehör > Keil-, Keilrippenriemen & Teile > Spann- & Umlenkrollen 008 new Profiline in stock Ein wunderschön detailreich gearbeiteter Herrenring Echte Handarbeit - Natursteine - jeder Ring ein Unikat Verjüngende Ringschiene ca. 21 - 3,3 mm Ringkopf ca. 15 x 20 x 6 mm Bronze und Silber besetzt mit Achat Durchbrucharbeit innen 123769000947 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DG8AAOSwYhdbJTwR/s-l1600.jpg https://www.ebay.de/itm/123769000947?norover=1&siteid=77&mkevt=1&mkcid=16&chn=psoc 59.0 EUR Silberring Männerring Siegelring Ring Sterlingsilber 925 Handarbeit Grün Achat Uhren & Schmuck > Echtschmuck > Ringe 008 used Handgefertigt in stock www.Musi24.de / Stefan Singh Alle Angebote Bewertungen Verkäufer speichern Kontakt Newsletter zuverlässiger Service tausende zufriedener Kunden E-Mail Support innerhalb von 24H, Montag-Freitag schnelle Lieferung versandfertig in 24H ELECTROLUX / AEG - 140000554083 - Niveauschalter, Druckwächter, Geschirrspüler Niveauschalter (switch assembly pressure), Analogsensor, Druckwächter Geschirrspüler Bitte prüfen Sie genau Ihre Modellnummer (Mod.) und Produktionsnummer (Prod. No.) auf dem Typenschild Ihrer Maschine. Diese finden Sie in der Regel hinter der Tür, auf der Rückseite oder im Handbuch. sofort lieferbar Neuware, OVP Marke: ELECTROLUX GTIN: 7321424016495 SKU: 200500033 Kapazität: 1 Gewährleistung: 12 Monate Installationsart: Eingebaut Kompatible Marken: Electrolux Betriebsart: Elektrisch Markenkompatibilität: Für AEG Modellkompatibilität: Geschirrspülmaschine Geeignet für: Geschirrspülmaschine Modell: Geschirrspülmaschine Farbe: Mehrfarbig Artikelzustand: Neu Produktart: Niveauschalter Bauform: Vollintegrie 316254799862 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/fxsAAOSwnvxnrKE5/s-l1600.jpg https://www.ebay.de/itm/316254799862?norover=1&siteid=77&mkevt=1&mkcid=16&chn=psoc 39.95 EUR Niveauschalter Geschirrspüler - Aeg - 91153640106 - Fsb53607z - Druckwächter Haushaltsgeräte > Geschirrspülmaschinen > Geschirrspülerteile 008 new Heim & Garten > Küche & Esszimmer > Zubehör für Küchengeräte > Spülmaschinenzubehör Electrolux in stock Motoröle Filter Bremsenteile Wischerblätter Aufhängung Zündung/Vorglühung Lichtmaschine und Anlasser eBay-Shop Autotivo Motoröle Filter Bremsenteile Wischerblätter Aufhängung Zündung/Vorglühung Lichtmaschine und Anlasser eBay-Shop Autotivo MANN-FILTER WK 939/12 x Kraftstofffilter für RENAULT Nummer EAN: 4011558968403 Hersteller: MANN-FILTER Herstellernummer: WK 939/12 x Spezifikation Höhe [mm] 187 Ergänzungsartikel/Ergänzende Info mit Dichtungen Filterausführung Leitungsfilter Verwendung in Fahrzeugen OE/OEM-Nummern Marke Modell Motortyp Jahre der Produktion kW HP ccm Notiz RENAULT GRAND SCÉNIC II (JM0/1_) 1.5 dCi (JM02, JM13) [200404-200811] 74Kw 101PS 1461ccm Baujahr ab : 01/2005, Filterausführung : mit Anschluss für Wassersensor, für OE-Nummer : 7701 062 104 RENAULT MEGANE II (BM0/1_, CM0/1_) 1.5 dCi (BM02, BM13, BM2A, CM02, CM13) [200310-200802] 74Kw 101PS 1461ccm Baujahr ab : 01/2005, Filterausführung : mit Anschluss für Wassersensor, für OE-Nummer : 7701 062 104 RENAULT MEGANE II (BM0/1_, CM0/1_) 1.5 dC 387748184967 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/8dMAAOSwnA1nZZJt/s-l1600.jpg https://www.ebay.de/itm/387748184967?norover=1&siteid=77&mkevt=1&mkcid=16&chn=psoc 24.47 EUR Mann-filter Wk 939/12 X Kraftstofffilter Für Renault Auto & Motorrad > Teile > Autoteile & Zubehör > Luft- & Kraftstoffversorgung > Kraftstofffilter 008 new Fahrzeuge & Teile > Fahrzeugersatzteile & -zubehör > Kfz-Teile > Kraftstoffanlagen MANN-FILTER in stock  MIP HIGHLINE102046 ENITFRESDE Everything can be delivered immediately and dispatched on the same day Alles sofort lieferbar Versand am gleichen Tag Tout peut être livré immédiatement et expédié le même jour Tutto può essere consegnato immediatamente e spedito lo stesso giorno Todo se puede entregar inmediatamente y despachar el mismo día Save 5% when you buy 2 or more items of Sparen Sie 5% wenn Sie mindestens 2 Artikel kaufen Économisez 5% lorsque vous achetez 2 articles ou plus de Risparmia il 5% quando acquisti 2 o più articoli di Ahorre un 5% al ​​comprar 2 o más artículos de Used auto parts with a functional guarantee Gebrauchte Autoteile mit Funktionsgarantie Pièces automobiles d'occasion avec garantie de fonctionnement Ricambi auto usati con garanzia funzionale Autopartes usadas con garantía funcional Part dispenser Teilespender Distributeur de pièces Distributore di parti Dispensador de piezas Part dispenser Teilespender Distributeur de pièces Distributore di parti Dispensador de piezas Part dispens 135094230766 https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/Q78AAOSwrA1mXyEi/s-l1600.jpg https://www.ebay.de/itm/135094230766?norover=1&siteid=77&mkevt=1&mkcid=16&chn=psoc 29.0 EUR Radnabenabdeckung Rad Nabenabdeckung Nabenblende Pos.4 Für Kia Soul I Am 08-11 Auto & Motorrad > Teile > Autoteile & Zubehör > Federung & Lenkung > Radlager, -naben & Buchsen 007 used Kia in stock Wichtig

Article by Mike Postaski, Sam Winebaum, John Tribbia, Renee Krusemark, Jeff Valliere, and Jacob Brady VJ Shoes MAXx2 ($180) Introduction Sam: Known for shoes at the extreme end of trail, orienteering and OCR, VJ from Finland launches the MAXx2 a supercritical foam (EVA/TPU) mid stack height (31mm heel / 25 forefoot) trail runner with their trademark super grippy butyl rubber outsole and medial FitLock strap. Super light at 8.47 oz  / 240g (US9),  it for sure appears to add up to a top notch thoroughly modern contender. Jacob: The MAXx2 is an exciting release is it the first VJ shoe (released alongside the Lightspeed) to incorporate a light weight supercritical foam midsole, along with a more refined upper and colorway. VJ shoes, notably the Ultra 2 and MAXx 1, have been my favorite mountain shoes for running in New England where it is rugged, technical, and usually wet. I have found them critical to my performance and trust in my feet when placing feet on wet rock, jagged edges, and off-camber slab descents. In the past two seasons, the few times I did a mountain run in a non-VJ shoe, I missed the VJ. The traction is the most exceptional aspect, but the secure foothold is equally as important.  However, for me, past VJs have had several negatives. Primarily, for all models, the ride is fairly dull. The old classic EVA midsole was nicely protected and did well in rugged, hiking-focused terrain and precise foot landing descents, but had a dead, slow ride on smoother terrain. Additionally, they were not notably comfortable—acceptable given the performance, but not exceptional. Mike P: Let’s get this out of the way - this IS the most consequential trail shoe released by VJ to date. What I mean by that - VJ models I’ve run in so far have been good, but there’s always been “something” missing or lacking that prevented them from feeling like a “true” trail shoe. The VJ brand has a background in OCR/Adventure racing, and it just felt like some of their shoes were skewed too much in that direction. Enter the VJ MAXx2 as well as the concurrently releasing VJ Lightspeed… We’ll get to the Lightspeed in a separate review, but the MAXx2 feels and runs like a legitimate trail shoe. Not an OCR-inspired, cross-over, rugged mountain-designed, just-short-of-runnable kind of shoe.. Not only is it legitimate, but it is a real threat to be a top pick in the market. It’s that good of a shoe. I have not seen our other testers’ reviews yet, but based on our initial back-and-forth “chatter”, I expect this review to be nothing short of “glowing”. I urge you - read on! Pros: Very light weight for cushion: Sam/Mike P/John/Renee/Jeff V/Jacob Versatile and fun ride, Energetic (supercritical foam) with a flexible propulsive rock plate: Sam/Mike P/John/Jeff V/Jacob Outstanding outsole and grip without being overly harsh on hard surfaces: Sam/Mike P/John/Renee/Jeff V/Jacob Secure midfoot hold on narrow platform due to Fitlock strap, excellent tongue/laces and underlays: Sam/Mike P/Jeff V/Jacob Fits broader than appearances at true to size: Sam/Mike P/Renee/Jeff V/Jacob Excellent fitting, soft and comfortable ankle/heel collar Mike P/Jeff V Cons: Upper could be more breathable, TBD in warmer temps Mike P Slightly spacious in the heel (nitpick) Mike P/Jacob Sizing is off - runs big compared to other brands and other VJ models Mike P/Jeff V Not quite road worthy for road-to-trail John/Jacob Please find the testers full run bios at the end of the article after Comparisons. Most ComparableShoes Merrell Long Sky 2 Matryx (Sam, Mike P) Brooks Catamount (Sam, Mike P, John) Saucony Peregrine (John) Salomon Genesis (Sam, Mike P) Stats Approx. weight: men's 8.47 oz  / 240g (US9)  /  women's oz / g (US8)   Samples: men’s  8.22 oz / 233g US8.5 ,  8.6 oz / 244g US 9.0 Stack Height: men’s 31 mm heel / 25 mm forefoot ( 6 mm drop)  Platform Width: 80 mm heel / 60 mm midfoot / 100 mm forefoot $180. Available from our partner Running Warehouse US HERE First Impressions, Fit and Upper Mike P: Let’s get the sizing talk out of the way first. My true-to-size is US 9.5, but I’ve been wearing US 10.5 in all VJ shoes that I’ve previously run and tested. This is due to a combination of them running small, having somewhat rigid uppers, and also being tapered up front at the toes. We were advised by VJ that we should SIZE DOWN for the MAXx2 - I frankly didn’t really listen too much, figuring a 10.0 would work fine given past experience. The MAXx2 does in fact run big - the 10.0 was so huge on me that I had to exchange a full size down to 9.0. So I in fact have all other previous VJ models in US 10.5 and the MAXx2 in 9.0!  I hope others will also comment on their sizing as well. Pay particular attention to those reviewers whose sizing you tend to align with. The MAXx 2 clearly brings a new generation of upper material to the VJ lineup. It’s an engineered mesh - somewhat on the thicker side, but not as rigid or rough as a lot of VJ models of the past. Very pliable, it wraps the foot exceptionally well and eliminates any sore spots, especially in the toebox. The material does seem thick - I do think breathability could be improved in the future by perhaps opening up the mesh a bit. Another huge update in my eyes is the collar area - specifically around the ankle and also the heel. This has been a problematic area for me in other VJ models. I’ve found them to be on the rigid side, sometimes to the point of being painful. Specifically, I had to trim down the VJ Ultra 1 collar to prevent it from digging into my ankle. VJ Ultra 2 was slightly better, but still something that needed to be tolerated. The MAXx2’s compliant upper extends back to these collars, making them totally comfortable, and happily - a non-issue. Inner suede-type padding keeps the heel comfortable and seated.  The heel cup is a bit spacious for my heel, but perhaps a perfect snug fit for others. That’s a small nitpick though, and overall the entire ankle/heel area is a major improvement for me. The fit of the upper feels dialed in all around - with the Fitlock strap providing noticeable support at the instep. VJ shoes are not typically contoured under the arch area. It seems like the Fitlock is there to provide that medial support. Overall, this is definitely the best upper VJ has ever produced.   John: As someone who hasn't had much experience with VJ shoes before, the MAXx2 is a pretty impressive encounter. The engineered mesh upper is a clear step up from what I've heard about past models. It's comfy, hugs my foot nicely, and doesn't seem to create any pressure points. Breathability seems alright, but I'll definitely need to test it out in warmer weather to be sure. Like Mike P, I appreciate the heel and collar fit. Plus, the Fitlock strap adds some serious support, making the whole upper feel like a major upside for VJ. The midsole is another interesting feature. It ditches the traditional EVA for something called SuperFoamance, which feels lighter, more responsive, and overall more comfortable. Overall, the MAXx2 feels like a well-rounded trail shoe and a highlight is the comfort. The upper is secure and foot hugging, and the SuperFoamance midsole promises a more dynamic ride. I'm excited to take these shoes on different terrains and see how they hold up in the long run. Sam: I was sent what VJ calls a W9.5 EU40.5 with all sizes below that having a W designation. An EU 40.5 or W9.5 corresponds to a men’s US8. My usual size in all shoes is US8.5 although I did go US9 in the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar and in Sportiva shoes.  The MAX fits me perfectly at what is a half size down from my normal.  The fit is precise without being in any way constricting, confining or over snug anywhere Seen from above, the toe box looks narrow but I think due to the thick but relatively pliable mesh upfront, no pressure points from overlays and a touch of stretch with use it fits beautifully with plenty of well held room up front for my narrow to medium feet. The lower part of the upper is fully protected by an overlay for durability and a touch of stability with the quite pliable but thickish toe bumper of the same material wrapping up just far enough but not to far as to interfere with over the toes room.rhead room.   Hold at midfoot is totally assured by a combination of a nearly full internal underlay and the trademark FitLock medial strap.  The lacing and tongue system joins the support impeccably to deliver a fuss free once and done hold. The tongue has a “top” gusset in the sense that it has a small stretch piece tied in to the top at the bottom of the lace eyelets. The tongue itself is very lightly padded. The broad non-stretch laces bring everything (FitLock strap and overlays and tongue together without requiring over cinching to provide support. Jacob: Out of the box, my first impression was that the style, from colors to design details, was more polished than previous VJs I have tested. The colors are not as bright, there are accents such as visual layers to the midsole, and it looks more professional overall. Additionally, the foam feels squishy and light. On the foot, it is clear that it is next-level in regard to midsole energy. Like the other reviewers, I want to discuss sizing as it is not easy to decide on size for the MAXx2 and size is critical to performance on rugged trails. I went for my typical size—I always like to start there. I wear the same size in 98% of models across brands. I did not size up in other VJs (TTS in Ultra, Spark, MAXx) and appreciated the snug fit for technical mountain running. In my usual size, the MAXx 2 is much roomier in the forefoot than the MAXx 1. I decided not to exchange which ended up being a mistake; I initially liked the increased room in the toe box, however, after a run on more rugged terrain, I realized I should have sized down. For me the value of VJ shoes is technical terrain performance. This comes of course from the 10/10 outsole material but also importantly the solid foothold. The MAXx2 at my standard size is still runnable and solid with a very roomy toebox, which is nice in some ways, but it is not as capable in technical terrain because of the fit. I think a half size down would be ideal for me. Renee: Everyone covers the details, so I’ll add my thoughts about sizing, which I think can make the difference in making this an okay shoe or a great shoe. As stated, VJ recommended a half size down. I’m already between half sizes. I normally wear a women’s size 8, occasionally a 7.5. I received an 8 in the MAXx2. Initially it seemed long, then once running it felt good. The issue is the forefoot creases on my toes rather than at my flexing point. The toebox felt a bit shallow for that reason. I’m guessing a half size down would solve that problem. Otherwise, the heel and midfoot lock are great. I ran in super muddy conditions, perfect for the tight fit and lug depth of the shoe.   Jeff V:  My colleagues have covered the mechanics and details of the upper so well, so like Renee, I will focus on fit and performance.  I am typically a size 10 in all shoes of any brand, though depending on the shoe I can often make a 9.5 work just fine.  Sometimes with winter shoes and/or La Sportiva, I will go 10.5, but going outside of size 10 is exceedingly rare.  As mentioned, we were advised to size down in the MAXX2 and going down a half size to 9.5 is perfect here.  I have reviewed the first MAXX, first Ultra and Ultra 2, Ace, Ice Hero, XTRM2 and Spark and have found that sticking to my normal size 10 is ideal for all of the aforementioned models, but again, going down a half size in the MAXX2 for me was the right call. This is for sure the best upper in the VJ line, striking an amazing balance between fit, comfort, relatively thin/light materials, protection and security.   I find the heel and midfoot to be very secure, with just enough room in the toe box for all day comfort, some wiggle room for splay/swelling, while simultaneously providing exceptionally confidence inspiring foothold no matter how technical the terrain or how fast you run.   The lacing is super secure, one and done, which I really like.  It bugs me with some shoes when you start at the bottom snugging the laces and the tension relieves after letting go of the laces and moving up to the next, but that is not the case here, as when you snug the laces, they stay put.   The FitLock system really adds to the security, stability and protection of the shoe, providing race like performance without that confining feel. Midsole & Platform Sam:  The midsole is the star of the MAXx2. Yes we have VJ’s customary and superb butyl outsole rubber and the FitLock upper joining the party  the “SuperFoamance” midsole with its nitrogen infused blend of EVA and TPU is the key and defining feature of the shoe. . The feel is very similar to Puma’s Nitro foam, not as firm as Brooks Flash as in the Catamount and more energetic quicker rebounding than Salomon’s Energy Foam found in all their current trail shoes. The foam delivers a super energetic high rebound  feel well stabilized and given some propulsion by the full length and flexible rock plate. VJ says:  "Why we chose the SuperFoamance over PeBA was the fact that the SuperFoamance material is far more durable in terrain. It does not rip as easily and the bonding to the outsole is much better. Tested in lab the rebound of PeBA and our foam is within 1% range, so we could say that the rebound is equal.. The advances are obvious - lighter, more responsive, more comfortable and more propulsive than traditional  EVA midsole." And also, significantly, this foam leads to a super lightweight shoe at 8.47 oz  / 240g (US9) on a considerably more than minimal 31/25 full stack height with a 4mm lug outsole. To give just one example, with more in Comparisons, the comparable Saucony Peregrine weighs about 1.2 oz / 34 g more on a slightly lower platform while the Brooks Catamount about 0.5 oz more on a slightly lower but wider platform  The light weight is clearly felt on the run while the cushioning is more than adequate for even some road running in them where the forefoot is notable for its energetic rebound and mild propulsion effect from the rockplate yet with flexibility.   Full length rock plate for protection, torsional rigidity and propulsion “I don’t have schematic on the MAXx2 rock plate, I assume it is a standard VJ Rock plate in that it is a thin piece of plastic. “ (feels quite thin, sort of like Salomon  - definitely not as rigid as the one in the Ultra -Mike P) Mike P: The full stack is measured at 31/25mm, with the midsole being specified at 19/13mm. I’m not too sure how that math works out, but the SuperFoamance midsole is a real treat - and the star of the shoe. It’s a supercritical EVA/TPU blend - which reminds of some of the more bouncy and lightweight blends like New Balance Fuel Cell and some of Brooks’ DNA Flash varieties. Light, well-cushioned, and responsive - these qualities are all felt on the run. The MAXx2 midsole is exceptionally flexible, enabling it to swallow up a wide variety of terrain underfoot. The SuperFoamance (yes, kind of a goofy name), feels so flexible, yet doesn’t get too mushy under stress - likely due to the embedded full length rock plate. We haven’t received exact specs on the MAXx2 plate, but in my testing, I find it far more flexible than the plate within the Ultra 2. It has the feel of Salomon’s Pro-feel film/plate - where it’s almost not noticeable on the run. But with the softness and bounciness of the foam itself, it definitely must be providing necessary support.  John: After putting some miles on the VJ MAXx2, I can say that Sam's description of the midsole being "energetic and high rebound" holds true. The shoe delivers a noticeable spring with each step, propelling you forward and adding a touch of pep to your stride. This responsiveness is particularly evident during faster paces and uphill sections, where the midsole seems to return energy efficiently. Even so, the shoe is surprisingly stable. The combination of the foam and the flexible rock plate prevents excessive rolling or instability on uneven terrain. This is crucial for maintaining control and confidence while navigating technical trails. The flexible rock plate strikes a nice balance between protecting your feet from sharp rocks and roots while still allowing for some degree of ground feel. You can sense the terrain beneath your feet without sacrificing protection, which I find incredibly important for maintaining agility and responsiveness on the trail. Renee: The shoe has a somewhat “cleat” look to it, but it runs much more comfortably than it looks. The supercritical EVA/TPU midsole compound is great for comfort and speed, and it’s a fairly light shoe considering cushion and outsole. The rock plate is not harsh, and on mud, I thought it helped with an even and fast takeoff. Running in mud over cattle hoof ruts is not smooth, but the shoe handles it well.  Jeff V:  Sam, as always, nails the mechanics and details of the midsole and I agree that it is the star of the show (along with the upper and outsole in a close tie for second).  VJ really nailed it here, as the SuperFoamance midsole is impressive in how light, responsive, well cushioned, stable and supportive it is.  The MAXX2 has a lot going for it in every regard, but I can't emphasize enough how key the midsole is here and a critical component to its overall performance.  The MAXX2 are exceptionally fast running uphill, cruising the flats or ripping a steep and technical downhill and there is enough cushion underfoot for longer downhills and protection from rocks and roots.   Jacob: The high performance of the modern SuperFoamance midsole also defines the MAXx2 for me compared to previous VJ shoes.  The foam is a lightweight, supercritical material that is moderately soft and flexible. There is a “rock plate”, but it isn’t prominent underfoot. The midsole is lightweight and low density and provides energy to keep me moving along and springing off the ground. The platform is narrow at the midfoot, medium at the heel, and relatively broad at the forefoot. The depth of foam is medium, it’s just cushioned enough for me on firm terrain to not be harsh but is not a high cushion shoe. I think the midsole has a good balance between protection, comfort, rebound, and stability. Outsole Mike P: Typically with a VJ shoe, this is a section I would harp on. making sure you’re aware that VJ’s Butyl rubber is the top trail rubber on the market. But at this point it’s pretty much a given, and there’s so many other good things going on with this shoe - let’s just say you can take it for granted that you’re going to get top-of-class grip and traction with this shoe. You don’t need to spend time poring over the Outsole section. Sam: My test runs have been on packed snow and on hard clear surfaces. The grip on snow is excellent due to the lug pattern. I can really feel it bite after initial contact. I do think Megagrip and Continental rubbers have a touch more initial stick on snow. I would highlight that on hard surfaces such as pavement, even with the 4mm lugs here, the rubber deforms enough as it on the soft side and shoe has it has nice flex is not slappy or harsh as say MegaGrip can be on such surfaces pointing to the all terrain versatility when the superb midsole is also in the mix. Mike P: Lug depth is 4mm - again, VJ’s Butyl rubber delivers the goods. I’ll just say that given the overall multi-directional flexibility of the shoe- the outsole grips even better than other VJ models. You get more contouring over the ground with the enhanced flexibility of the midsole and the shoe in general. John: My experience with the VJ MAXx2's outsole is similar to Mike P and Sam's observations. I was able to run on snow, mud, technical trail, and road. On snow, the lug pattern delivers exceptional grip. The MAXx2 feels incredibly secure and confidence-inspiring and also handles mud effectively, with the lug spacing preventing excessive caking and maintaining decent traction. On technical trails with loose rocks, roots, and uneven surfaces, the combination of the lug pattern and flexible rock plate provides good grip and stability, allowing for confident navigation without sacrificing agility. Even on the road, the outsole performs surprisingly well. Overall, despite the 4mm lugs, the rubber compound offers enough traction without feeling harsh or uncomfortable, highlighting the shoe's versatility and living up to its reputation for excellent grip and performance on various terrains.  Renee: I ran mostly in thick mud during testing. I agree with the thoughts about the shoe being more forgiving on packed surfaces than it looks. For a mix of terrain, that’s appreciated. That said, it won’t be super comfortable off technical or ungroomed terrain for long distances. The platform is a bit narrow to be a slow cruiser.  I had mud completely caked to the outsole and was able to continue running without stopping to remove the mud.  Jeff V:  VJ advertises the “Best Grip On the Planet” and that of course holds true here.  Traction is exceptional on snowy surfaces, loose off trail, slabby rocks, wet, dry, you name it.  The lug pattern is aggressive and effective with a super sticky rubber compound.  Durability has proven excellent on all previous models (except for the original Ultra due to a design flaw that was since corrected in the Ultra 2) and I expect the same here. Jacob: In my testing of dozens of trail shoes over the last six years on most often rocky, rooty, wet and rugged New England terrain, VJ shoes rubber provides the best traction of any outsole material. The MAXx2 uses the same rubber and has 10/10 traction. It is confidence inspiring and allows running fast and confidently on everything from wet roots in the forest understory to jumping across tips of talus in the mountains.  Ride, Conclusions and Recommendations Sam: I am recovering from knee surgery in November with 2 titanium screws now on board so my running has been cautious and slower than usual on packed well groomed snow, road and  even an indoor track so will leave the more technical trails view to Mike and John. I always do at least some runs in trail shoes on pavement to closely compare and evaluate without trail variabilities. Here the MAX, while in no way a road shoe, was outstanding for its energetic cushion, stability despite narrow platform and flexible quick toe off with far less of the harsh impact of the 4mm outsole than I can recall with other shoes in its class.  The blend of energetic cushion and outsole response blends together very nicely and the light light weight has then turning over super quick.  On hard surfaces, the heel does feel a bit firm while the forefoot is surprisingly well cushioned and notably snappy and energetic leading me to my “fastest” times since surgery even compared to road trainers. On snow, they grip and climb very well while on uneven downhills they provide plenty of support. What might improve it? A bit more stack height of cushion to extend its range. That said, given the foam VJ might have to widen the platform some to maintain technical terrain stability adding to weight. At $180 it is at the upper end of pricing for non carbon plated trail shoes but its performance clearly puts it in the same class as Salomon’s S/Lab shoes. My conclusion, albeit considering limited terrain variety so far, is that the MAX given its light weight for cushion and 4mm lug outsole, energetic, fast yet stable ride is a top choice if you are looking for a versatile thoroughly modern trail runner. It can handle any kind of terrain as fast or as slow as you wish, for pretty much any distance, rarely the case with increasingly specialized trail shoes. It is one shoe I keep wanting to reach for. VJ, for sure a brand that masters the highly technical terrain as well as any brand, now has an option with far broader appeal and with many smiles in the mix. Sam’s Score: 9.6 /10 Ride: 9.7 - Versatile and fun. Would trade some weight for more stack height Fit: 9.8 - Flawless,  Value: 9.2 - A bit high Style: 9.0 - Sharp looking but a bit bright Traction: 9.7 - Great grip yet comfortable and not harsh on firm surfaces Rock Protection: 9.3 More than adequate for such a light shoe Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊 Mike P: In thinking about how to best describe the MAXx2 - the most appropriate way to describe it would be this - it’s just a joy to run in. My first two runs straight out of the box were 10+ miles, then 12+ miles. No break-in necessary, they were fully flexible and ready to rock straight away. My feet felt comfortable, and happy throughout, the comfort of the upper really standing out in my mind compared to other, “rougher” on the foot VJ models. This is truly a modern design from VJ, and comparable to any of the top trail shoes on the market right now. VJ is also releasing another model concurrently - the Lightspeed. They gave us guidance that the Lightspeed model leaned more into concept/”pro” territory, meant to push the limits of their new designs. I do find that the case in comparison to the MAXx2. The MAXx2 has a wider, more stable base, clearly more versatile for pretty much all trails and all trail runners. The Lightspeed also has a different, more propulsive plate. We will have a separate review for the Lightspeed.   The MAXx2 is a shoe that you could easily run every day - easy runs, moderate runs, short fast runs, long runs, and ultra runs for many. It’s not a max cushion shoe, but somewhere in the midrange, so how far you take it may depend on how much foam you prefer underfoot. For lighter runners, such as myself, this is clearly a mid-distance ultra option, potentially longer.  As far as terrain, protection is good, and the shoe is agile enough for the shoe to be workable in technical terrain. I’d say the sweet spot would be anywhere up to moderate/low technical terrain. Beyond that, the bounciness of the foam may work against you over extended periods. In thinking about the most comparable shoes (Salomon Genesis, Brooks Catamount 3, Merrell Long Sky 2 Matryx) - those 3 are the are the best I can do, but the MAXx2 is more like a mashup of those 3 shoes rather than being similar to any single one of those. It has the cushion and comfort underfoot of the Genesis, but not quite as much. It has a similar quick ride to the Catamount, but a little bit more flexy underfoot, and not quite as much straight ahead speed. It has a similar light, flexible, and agile feel as the Long Sky 2 Matryx, but a touch softer underfoot and also a bit more comfort in the upper. These 4 are all great, top of the line trail shoes - territory that VJ now squarely occupies with the VJ MAXx 2.  Mike P’s Score:  9.70 / 10 Ride: 10 - Simply a joy to run in  Fit: 9.5 - Minor extra space in the heel for me, odd sizing compared to other VJs Value: 9 - A bit high, but as versatile a shoe as you will find Style: 10 - Great looking shoe Traction: 10 - VJ’s trademark Rock Protection: 9.5 - Good and adequate, fits the profile/ride of the shoe Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊 John: The shoe delivers a comfortable and responsive ride thanks to the well-cushioned SuperFoamance midsole. The energetic feel propels you forward, while the flexible rock plate provides stability and protection without sacrificing ground feel. Holding up to VJ’s reputation, the outsole offers excellent grip on diverse surfaces, from snow and mud to technical trails and even occasional concrete stretches. I’m a big fan of this shoe, particularly in terms of comfort and upper. The engineered mesh upper has zero pressure points and provides a secure, enveloping comfortable fit. From my perspective, the MAXx2 is a compelling option for trail runners seeking a comfortable, responsive, and versatile shoe. It caters well to runners who prioritize comfort, protection, and appreciate some pep in their step especially on the uphills. While the snug fit might not suit everyone, the improved upper should accommodate a wider range of foot shapes. John’s Score:  9.35 / 10 Ride: 9 - Solid performer with great energy return  Fit: 9.5 - Super snug and conforming Value: 9 - Very versatile shoe, but not a full road-to-trail Style: 9 - I think every shoe should have Lime Green accents Traction: 10 - Outstanding Rock Protection: 9.5 - Just enough to protect with ground feel Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊 Renee: The MAXx2 is a fun shoe, useful for ungroomed and sloppy conditions without having a “cleat-like” ride. Despite the somewhat narrow look, the fit is more generous and it’s meant to have a secure fit. For me, the sizing was an issue. I’m between half sizes in many brands and models, and the forefoot of the MAXx2 creases in an odd spot over my toes. A half size smaller might be best for runners between half sizes. If you like the VJ shoes for obstacle racing or fell running but want more comfort underfoot for running (without compromising speed), the MAXx2 is a good option.  Renee’s Score: 9.0/10 (-.30 sizing, -.50 toebox is shallow, -.20 limited terrain) 😊😊😊 (overall, more smiles on sloppy conditions) Jeff V:  VJ has quickly become one of my favorite brands and the MAXX2 is hands down their best model yet.  With a comfortable and somewhat accommodating upper that provides race ready security and stability, a light, fun, well cushioned stable predictable midsole and unparalleled grippy outsole, the MAXX2 checks all my boxes for running fast on steep, technical mountain terrain.   They are so much fun and such a joy to run in, be it a casual outing, or cranking up the pace for PR of race efforts on any terrain, steep gradients, off camber, they are fast, energetic, performance oriented, stable, protective, well cushioned and comfortable.  They are one of the rare shoes that you put on, run anywhere, any surface at any speed and don’t really think of them on your feet, as they just seem to integrate as part of your body.  The majority of my testing has been in primarily winter conditions, but I am eager for the trails to melt out and get them up into the high country, where I know they will excel.  If I were forced to get rid of all of my shoes and just keep one pair, I could make a strong case for picking the MAXX2.  Jeff V’s Score:  9.9 / 10 Ride: 10 - For its intended purpose, the MAXX2 is tops  Fit: 10 - Despite the need to size down a half size, once you do that, fit is perfect for me, just accommodating enough for all day comfort, yet with supreme foothold and stability. Value: 10 - While $180 is pricy, it is not out of line given the performance, versatility and fun they provide. Style: 9 - They look pretty good, especially once mudded up a bit. Traction: 10 - Best Grip on the Planet! Rock Protection: 9.5 - enough for technical terrain, yet provides just the right balance of trail feel. Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊 Jacob: The VJ MAXx2 is another great shoe from VJ—for all-around trail running I think it is their best shoe yet. The ride, due to the new supercritical midsole, is the most pleasant and smooth of any VJ shoe I have run. It is soft and energetic but not overly so (for example, when compared to modern road shoes). It has a medium level of cushion and is connected to the ground. It is stable with notable ground feel. It is far from tippy or mushy. On hard packed trails when running easy, I wish for more cushion, but on soft ground or more technical trail it is balanced and enjoyable. For a shoe that is excellent on rugged trail, it is solid on road. I did a number of high effort sprints on road after trail runs and wasn’t too burdened. Sizing is important—for me I think a half size down from my typical size would be best (uncommon for me). At my usual size with my medium width foot it is locked in at the midfoot and also comfortably roomy in the toe box but not sloppy—great on smoother terrain but not as much control on technical trail as I want due to excess length past the toes. Overall, I recommend the MAXx2 for all runners looking for a versatile trail shoe with a balanced ride, secure fit, and amazing traction. It is useful for daily training and racing.  Jacob’s Score: 9.55 / 10 Ride: 9.5 (30%) Fit: 9.5 (30%) Value: 10 (10%)  Style 8 (5%) Traction: 10 (15%)  Rock Protection: 9.5 (10%) Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊 10 Comparisons Index to all RTR reviews: HERE MAXx2 Stats 31 mm heel / 25 mm forefoot ( 6 mm drop)  Approx. 8.47 oz  / 240g (US9) Platform Width: 80 mm heel / 60 mm midfoot / 100 mm forefoot Brooks Catamount 3 (RTR Review) men's 9 oz  / 255g (US9)  30mm heel / 24mm forefoot ( 6mm drop spec)   Platform Width: 90mm heel / 73mm midfoot / 120mm forefoot Mike P (10.0): Catamount’s foam is firmer underfoot, but also gives a quicker ride - part of that due to the nature of its SkyVault plate. The Brooks plate seems to give more forward propulsion around the ball of the foot, whereas the VJ plate seems more flexible for protection, adding a small amount of propulsion, but less noticeable. The Catamount has a wider, more stable base and the upper is slightly wider at the forefoot. The VJ’s upper is more compliant, wraps just as well, but perhaps a touch less strapped down than the Cat 3 - very close though. Clear win in traction/grip for the VJ. MAXx2’s dynamic softness feels really good and most runners would probably prefer that for day-to-day trail running. Sam: I agree with Mike on all points. Same idea, a bit more shoe and protection for the Brooks but a firmer less dynamic fun ride. Renee: Everything Mike P. wrote. For sizing, a women’s 8 in the Catamount 3 is perfect, while the MAXx2 felt a bit long causing discomfort over my toes. The Catamount is a more diverse shoe in terms of terrain.  Jeff V: Agreed with Mike.  Catamount for faster straight line running on less technical terrain over longer distances, while the MAXX2 is more of a tech terrain master. VJ Ultra 2 (RTR Review) men’s 9.5 oz  / 269g US9 Stack Height: men’s 33 mm heel / 27 mm forefoot  Mike P (10.5): Again note the extreme sizing difference here for me. Ultra 2 is listed at a slightly higher stack - its foam feels softer initially, but it’s more of a standard EVA so it packs down over time. It’s nowhere near as dynamic in feel as the MAXx 2. Ultra 2 also has an embedded rock plate confirmed by VJ as the same material in both but  due to the nature of the foam - it feels much stiffer than the MAXx 2. It’s more protective in very rough stuff, but the MAXx2 is more comfortable in anything less. Ultra 2’s upper is a bit rougher on the foot, the collars are a bit stiff and the toebox tapers a bit. MAXx 2 upper is much more foot shaped and comfortable. I’d pick the MAXx2 for all but the most extreme terrain. Jeff V:  Agreed with Mike.  The Ultra 2 was one of my faves, but the MAXX2 blows it away on every front. Jacob: The MAXx2 has a much for versatile and modern ride, is lighter,  more comfortable, and has better traction (less exposed foam). In the same size, the Ultra 2 is tighter with less toebox space and is more secure in the toebox, thus being better for mountain running and moving fast on rugged terrain. At a smaller size than my sample, the MAXx2 may be better in all ways.  VJ XTRM 2 (RTR Review) Sample Weight: men’s US 10.5 10.2 oz  / 288 g Stack Height: men’s mm 24 heel / 20 mm forefoot, 4mm drop Mike P (10.5): XTRM 2 for me is really a dedicated off-trail, “XTRM” terrain option. It’s the narrowest VJ I’ve run in, stiff and protective underfoot, with awesome traction. It allows you to dance around in XTRM terrain while feeling totally safe and secure. That comes at a cost though - the shoe doesn’t feel as runnable in moderate terrain, is much heavier and also the upper is quite narrow and dialed - too much for some. The MAXx2 would be unstable in the extreme terrain that the XTRM 2 excels in, but is way better everywhere else. Jeff V:  Again agreed with Mike.  I see the XTRM2 better suited for softer terrain, shorter distances and perhaps better loose terrain grip.  Definitely not as versatile as the MAXX2 and more niche. NNormal Kjerag (RTR Review) men's 7.59 oz / 215g US8.5 given fit equivalent US9   Stack Height: men’s 23.5 mm heel / 17.5 mm forefoot (6mm drop spec)  Mike P (9.5): Kjerag also uses a supercritical foam (not sure what blend though), but it does feel and is by stack height way thinner underfoot and less bouncy and dynamic. It’s really a minimalist trail shoe compared to most trail shoes. The uppers feel similar in terms of thickness and density, and the use of suede-type materials on the inside. There’s more forefoot space in the Kjerag, but otherwise through the midfoot and heel they’re about the same. The VJ wins in traction/grip, and overall the MAXx2 is probably a much better option for 99% of trail runners. Sam: Almost a full ounce lighter the Kjerag has a similar foam but quite a bit less of it so has a firmer ride and a slightly more agile one. While I appreciate the broad Kjerag toe box the MAX’s upper is overall a bit more locked down and secure.  Jeff V:  While I really like the Kjerag, I find it to be a little delicate in tech terrain and surprisingly lacks traction, where the MAXX2 feels more protective and suited for longer distances (we all can’t be Killian) and blows the Kjerag away in technical terrain with better traction, security and protection underfoot (again, we all can’t be Killian). Salomon Pulsar Trail Pro (RTR Review) Mike P (9.5): I say this for every PTP 2 comp - it’s just a really stiff shoe. That’s the main and obvious differentiating factor here too. PTP 2 is very stiff, downright tippy in uneven terrain, while the MAXx2 - much more flexy and dynamic. PTP 2 does have a nice, well-rounded toebox though, one of Salomon’s best. But MAXx2 is a way better shoe. Jeff V: The PTP is fast on the uphill if smooth, but is downright harsh, narrow and tippy.  The MAXX2 kills the PTP in all regards. Salomon Genesis (RTR Review) Weight: men's  9.63 oz / 273g (US9)  Stack Height: men’s 30 mm heel / 22 mm forefoot ( drop spec)        Platform Width:85 mm heel / 70 mm midfoot / 115 mm forefoot Mike P (9.5): I recently tested the Genesis - it feels like there’s a lot more cushion underfoot in the Salomon due in part to its broader platform. The foam feels somewhat similar, there just seems to be more of it in the Genesis - noticeable under the heel. The VJ SuperFoamance does feel more responsive. The Genesis has a wider platform, making it feel nice and soft, yet stable underfoot, very versatile in mileage and duration. It’s likely more comfortable than the MAXx 2 over longer durations. The VJ feels more agile, and frankly, more fun to run in for most regular runs. VJ’s outsole with its more spaced out lugs offers better traction. Both are great shoes and I have them both in rotation. Sam: As Mike says. The Salomon is comparatively mushy as it is softer, about 1.2 oz / 34g heavier and  less responsive with its broader platform making it more stable, more deeply cushioned and less agile and fun.  Jeff V:  The Genesis is amazing and great for just about everything, and feels more cushioned and protective for longer distances on slightly less tech terrain, but if wanting to go super fast in a shorter to mid distance technical race or PR effort, the MAXX2 is the top choice. Jacob: The Genesis feels more soft, cushioned, dynamic, and bouncy. It is more plush overall in ride—I would not use “plush” to describe the MAXx2 at all. The MAXx2 traction and foothold is much better. For long runs especially on smoother terrain I would use the Genesis—for shorter runs in more technical terrain, especially if wet, I’d pick the MAXx2. Merrell Long Sky 2  (RTR Review) Approx. Weight: men's 8.6 oz  / 244g (US9)    Full Stack Height: men’s 30 mm heel (measured / 26 mm forefoot ( 4mm drop spec)  Platform Width:85 mm heel / 65 mm midfoot / 105 mm forefoot  A touch (0.11 oz heavier), almost the same stack height, somewhat  wider platform, about the same outsole depth, maybe a touch more. Why so close in weight? the Matryx upper is lighter. Mike P (9.5): One of my 3 closest comps - it’s similar to the VJ in that it’s a lightweight, very flexible, no-nonsense, kind of a throwback trail shoe. It’s very modern though - and its Matryx upper gets the edge over the VJ in terms of secure foothold and also breathability. VJ wins out in the midsole department  though - it just feels softer and more dynamic in comparison.  The Merrell holds it own for fun factor though due to its light weight which is very close to the VJ’s  The one negative factor with the LS 2 is the heel area - a bit stiff against the back of the heel and also the collar is loose, letting debris in. That issue gives the overall edge to the MAXx 2. LaSportiva Prodigo (RTR Review) John: Prodigio is a great choice for long-distance runners who want a comfortable and cushioned shoe. MAXx2 is a good option for runners who want a responsive and agile shoe with great ground feel that is ideal for technical terrain. Topo MTN Racer (RTR Review) Mike P (9.5): Just as flexible and soft feeling underfoot - but the Topo Zipfoam can’t compete with the SuperFoamance of the VJ. The VJ just feels so much more dynamic underfoot. The MTN Racer 3 soaks up miles, feels very comfortable, especially if you want that wide toebox, but is not as much “fun” as the MAXx2. The VJ also seems to have better rock protection. MTN Racer 3 has no plate (I’m happy for that), so sometimes you can feel some terrain underfoot given its flexibility. The MAXx2’s plate is flexible almost to the point of not feeling it, which is great. The VJ is a better overall shoe, but I still like and recommend the MTN Racer 3 for comfortable training miles. Renee: Again, Mike P. knows his shoes. The MTN Racer 3 has more stack and comfort for longer distances and a more accommodating upper. The MAX is more secure and faster, and has a “fun” factor. The MTN Racer 3 is a more diverse shoe for me on varied terrain.  Saucony Peregrine (RTR Review) 9.62 oz  /  271g US9 Stack Height: men’s 28mm heel / 24 mm forefoot 4 mm drop Slightly lower heel more than an ounce heavier, non supercritical foam midsole Mike P (9.5): The latest Peregrine fell into kind of a no-man’s land for me. Not quite high enough to be a high-stack option, yet high enough and not stable enough to be a faster option. Its best usage for me was moderate distance, easy training miles, of which there are many options out there. That being said, for that scenario, the MAXx2 is a much better and way more fun option. It also has way more range in other areas such as faster running and longer, and technical running. I can’t think of a scenario where I’d choose the Peregrine over the MAXx 2.  Renee: The Peregrines are one of my favorite shoes (versions 12 and 13). The shoe feels lighter and more runnable. The MAXx2 has a more secure upper and a more useful outsole for super muddy conditions. I can see the MAXx2 being more useful for technical terrain for skilled runners, but for me, the Peregrine can be used for basically anything.  John: The MAXx2 is a comfortable and versatile trail shoe, emphasizing balanced cushioning, responsiveness, and grip on diverse terrains. The Peregrine X, on the other hand, caters to performance-oriented runners seeking a lightweight feel, higher energy return, and excellent traction on technical trails. The center of gravity and ground feel of the MAXx2 gives me more confidence in technical terrain compared to the Peregrine and I would use the Saucony more for runnable trails.  Jacob: The Peregrine is similar in some ways to the MAXx2 as an all around trail shoe but is more like a road shoe in fit and ride. On technical trail I find the MAXx2 much more performant. I think the Peregrine is easier to run and feels faster on smooth terrain. The Peregrine foothold is not secure enough for confident technical running for me. I like both shoes overall, but if I had to use one, it would for sure be the MAXx2. Saucony Xodus Ultra (RTR Review) Mike P (9.5): The XU 2 is very close to the Peregrine 13 - I think Saucony overlapped the shoes too much. It’s a little higher and a little wider, and that’s about it. I do think it’s a better pick over the Peregrine due to those factors. Compared to the MAXx 2, there’s more cushion underfoot, and if the fit feels comfortable for you, it could be a better option for longer, moderate trail runs. The VJ is again more dynamic underfoot though, and more versatile in shorter/faster running. It also has long range rivaling the XU 2 depending on your preference for volume of cushion underfoot. Available at  VJ SHOES  SHOP HERE AMAZON   Men's & Women's SHOP HERE RUNNING WAREHOUSE US Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE 2 Day Shipping EASY No Sweat Returns Tester Profiles Mike Postaski currently focuses on long mountainous ultras - anywhere from 50K up to his favorite - 100M. 5'10", 138 lbs, midfoot/forefoot striker - he typically averages 70 mpw (mostly on trails), ramping up to 100+ mpw during race buildups. A recent 2:39 road marathoner, his easy running pace ranges from 7:30 - 9:00/mi. From 2022-23 Mike has won the Standhope 100M, IMTUF 100M, and Scout Mountain 100M trail ultras. He also set a CR of 123.74M at the Pulse Endurance Runs 24H and completed the Boise Trails Challenge on foot in 3 days 13 hours, besting the previous record by 7 hours. Mike's shoe preferences lean towards firmer, dense cushioning, and shoes with narrower profiles. He prefers extra forefoot space, especially for long ultras, and he strongly dislikes pointy toe boxes. John Tribbia (5' 6", 130lbs) is a former sponsored mountain/trail runner who has run with La Sportiva, Brooks/Fleet Feet, Pearl Izumi, and Salomon. Even though he competes less frequently these days, you can still find John enjoying the daily grind of running on any surface, though his favorite terrain is 30-40% grade climbs. He has won races such as America's Uphill, Imogene Pass Run, and the US Skyrunner Vertical Kilometer Series; and he's held several FKTs on several iconic mountains in Boulder, Colorado and Salt Lake City, Utah. If you follow him on Strava, you'll notice he runs at varying paces between 5 minutes/mile to 12 minutes/mile before the break of dawn almost every day. Jeff Valliere loves to run and explore the mountains of Colorado, the steeper and more technical the better. He has summited all of the 14ers in the state and can be found on mountain trails daily, no matter the weather, season, conditions or whether there is daylight or not.  On the side he loves to ski (all forms) bike and hike, often with his family, as he introduces his 12 year old daughters to the outdoors. Jeff was born and raised in New Hampshire, but has called Colorado home for over 25 years. He is 5’9” and 145 lbs. Renee is a former U.S. Marine journalist, which is when her enjoyment of running and writing started. She isn’t that awesome of a runner, but she tries really hard. Most of her weekly 50-60 miles take place on rural country roads in Nebraska, meaning mud, gravel, dirt, hills, and the occasional field. She has PR’s of 1:30:59 for the half marathon and 3:26:45 for the marathon. Sam is the Editor and Founder of Road Trail Run. He is 66 with a 2018 3:40 Boston qualifier. 2022 was Sam’s 50th year of running. He has a decades old 2:28 marathon PR. These days he runs halves in the just sub 1:40 range if he gets very very lucky. Sam trains 30-40 miles per week mostly at moderate paces on the roads and trails of New Hampshire and Utah be it on the run, hiking or on nordic skis. He is 5’9” tall and weighs about 164 lbs, if he is not enjoying too many fine New England IPA’s. Samples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased via shopping links in this article. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Comments and Questions Welcome Below! Please let us know mileage, paces, race distances, and current preferred shoes RoadTrailRun Official Store Custom Fractel Caps and Bucket Hats Cap:$39                                                             Bucket:$49 Limited Release! SHOP HERE WATCH OUR YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE ROADTRAILRUN CHANNEL Find all RoadTrailRun reviews at our index page HERE  Google "roadtrailrun Shoe Name" and you can be quite sure to find just about any run shoe over the last 10 years Please Like and Follow RoadTrailRun Facebook: RoadTrailRun.com  Instagram: @roadtrailrun You Tube: @RoadTrailRun

Article by Mike Postaski, Renee Krusemark, Jacob Brady, and Adam Glueck VJ Lightspeed ($200) Pros: Super light weight: Renee, Mike P, Jacob, Adam Great energy return: Renee, Mike P, Adam Secure upper: Renee, Mike P, Jacob, Adam Excellent traction: Renee, Mike P, Jacob, Adam Excellent heel hold - slightly better than MAXx2 Mike P, Renee, Jacob, Adam Cons: Sizing is tricky: Renee, Mike P Thick upper - could be more breathable Mike P, Renee, Jacob, Adam Laces seem unnecessarily thick Mike P Unstable rear - need to be “on your toes” Mike P, Renee, Jacob Plate makes the shoe less versatile Jacob Slightly too much heel hold, can cause blisters if not careful Adam Stats Approx. Weight: men's 8.6 oz  / 244g (US9)    women's 7.01 oz / 198g US8   Samples: men’s  8.8 oz / 250g US9.5 ,  oz / g US                   women’s 7.01 oz / 198g US8 Stack Height: men’s 29 mm heel / 23 mm forefoot ( 6mm drop spec)  $200  Available now First Impressions, Fit and Upper Mike P: Out of VJ’s two latest releases-the other being the MAXx2 (RTR Review), the Lightspeed is called out as the more “advanced” and in a sense “elite level” shoe. We were actually given this guidance by VJ when introduced to the new models (including MAXx2) for testing.  Designed for the “high end runner”, the Lightspeed has some characteristic features that make it speedier and more agile, but perhaps requiring a bit more control from the runner in order to keep them reined in. We’ll get into those specifics later in the review. First point, I have to mention the sizing issue with the Lightspeed, and also in comparison against VJ’s models. I have a perfect true to size US 9.5 fit in the Lightspeed. My test pair of the MAXx2 in comparison - I have a perfect fit in a US 9.0 (I have literally ZERO shoes from any brand in a size 9.0).  These are two similar shoes, not the same, “siblings” more or less - yet the numeric sizing is way different. Also consider the fact that I wear US 10.5 in previous VJ models - Ultra 1, Ultra 2, Spark, XTRM 2, with the exception of the Ace which I have in a 10.0. Needless to say, I think VJ needs to pick a relative sizing and stick with it.  With that out of the way - back to the Lightspeed itself. My first impression was that the upper material itself looked noticeably thick. We’re used to so many light, engineered mesh uppers these days - and this is nothing of the sort. It’s somewhat felty/suede on the interior due to an array of underlays, and on the outside, the material seems quite thick. I assume they are going for durability here, but breathability may be a concern. Despite the thickness of the material itself - it still retains some flexibility, and I find a nice and secure wrap around the foot. The shape of the shoe is a bit narrower compared to the MAXx2, but I find that upper material compliant enough that I don’t notice any extra squeezing. No pressure at the toes.  The collar around the ankle and heel maintains that inner felty/suede material - which is soft, with no rigid edges rubbing into the ankle/heel. This is good, and better than the VJ Ultra model for example.  One other difference with the MAXx2 that I’ll point out is the heel cup. I find it more shaped in the Lightspeed - it seems to “cup” around the heel bone a bit better. It feels just a bit more dialed than the MAXx2, where I did notice some slight extra space inside the heel. Renee: I’ll reiterate Mike’s thoughts about sizing, although I have the opposite issue. I wore a women’s size 8 in the Lightspeed, and running them I think a 7.5 would work best. If between half sizes, the shorter might be best.  As Mike wrote, the upper material feels a bit thick and therefore somewhat inflexible across the toe box. I had issues with the forefoot material causing irritation on my big toe. I think, with a better fit (smaller size), that irritation would decrease. Otherwise, the security and hold across the midfoot and heel are excellent. Jacob: I am a frequent user and big fan of VJ shoes since I tested the MAXx one a few years ago. For technical single track, especially New England rugged mountain routes or when it’s wet, the combination of the best traction in the industry and solid foothold leads to high performance.  I received the Lightspeed at the same time as the MAXx 2 to test. I was more excited for the MAXx as the Lightspeed has a plate (for speed), which I thought would not be ideal for rock hopping and scrambling, thus decreasing performance in the terrain I like VJs for.  However, the modern foam, low weight, and more refined upper design is intriguing—I like the direction VJ is going. Out of the box, my first impressions were that it’s more elegant in design than any prior VJ. It also felt light and the platform was notably narrow; very narrow at the midfoot and heel. Weighing confirmed the low weight at 271 g / 9.6 oz in my US Men’s 12—lighter than the Spark by eight grams and the third lightest trail shoe I have weighed/tested out of 40. Fit for me is nearly perfect. It’s the highlight of the Lightspeed. I went my typical size for all brands and models (including previous VJs). It’s secure and performance-oriented being relatively narrow, but there is just enough space for my toes to splay to not feel uncomfortable on the outside little toes. Length is slightly longer than the Ultra and MAXx 1. The midfoot and heel is glove-like with no slipping. The Fitlock band works really well on this model.  Previous VJs for me for a bit loose around the heel collar—never a performance issue, but does let in debris and it was hard to determine lace tightness and felt sloppy—that is not a factor in the Lightspeed,  it has a minimally padded collar with medium support and grippy fabric that wraps my foot. I can run fast on technical terrain without being concerned about my foot moving in the shoe but it’s not too tight that it puts pressure on my toes. The fit is ideal for my medium width foot. The primary upper material is a dense weave fabric that is relatively stiff (good foothold) and feels durable. Breathability is low but that hasn’t been a problem for me testing in the winter and early spring. Adam:  The Lightspeed  is the first shoe from VJ I’ve tested, and it’s quite a compelling first shoe to test.  The Lightspeed fits squarely into one of my favorite genres of trall shoes, light, fast, and capable trail.   The first thing I noticed was the precision of the upper.  Although breathable, there’s noticeable overlays, and although the toes have room to move, the suede-like material on the heel and overall upper stiffness locks the foot down 100%.  This is both a pro and a con.  When combined with the weight the shoes are effortlessly precise which is a huge win on technical trails.  On my longest test run, I did have some irritation from the stiffness of the heel counter on my achilles, but adjusting the lacing diminished it, and I had no further issues over 15 miles.   That being said, over 15 miles is not a place where I personally would enjoy using this shoe, so for the intended purpose, I think the upper is more than adequate.  The shoe feels fast, energetic, and incredibly grippy. Midsole & Platform From VJ: “The midsole material on the Lightspeed and MAXx2 is a nitrogen infused EVA and TPU blend that we call SuperFoamance, commonly called a supercritical foam. The advances are obvious - lighter, more responsive, more comfortable and more propulsive  than traditional  EVA midsole.  Why we chose the SuperFoamance over PeBA was the fact that the SuperFoamance material is far more durable in terrain. It does not rip as easily and the bonding to the outsole is much better. Tested in lab the rebound of PeBA and our foam is within 1% range, so we could say that the rebound is equal. For the Lightspeed plate we tested 4 different materials: carbon fiber, nylon and two special polymers. We ended up with one of those special polymers made of renewable castor bean oil.  For the plate shape we decided to go with Y-shape which provides the stiffness and rebound lengthwise but on the same time makes the shoe stable crosswise. The plate is increasing the rebound and adding running economy which leads to outcome that you can run faster and do for it longer period of time.” Mike P: The Lightspeed shares the same SuperFoamance midsole foam as in the MAXx2. It has a similar very soft, bouncy, light and energetic feel.  VJ provided specific midsole specs with the MAXx2 listed at 19/23mm and the Lightspeed at 18/22mm. We measured an effective total stack of 31mm at the heel for the MAXx2, so the Lightspeed is similarly in the range of 30mm under the heel, so mid-range in terms of cushion. Despite the same foam and almost identical stacks, the two shoes are quite different in feel underfoot. The Lightspeed sits on a much narrower platform - notably under the midfoot. There are also differences in the plate construction.  We didn’t get an exact diagram of the MAXx 2 plate, but to me it felt more like a thin, flexible, impact-deflection style plate, similar to Salomon’s flex film and said by VJ to be nearly identical to the plate in their Ultra, a higher stack broader platform shoe with a non supercritical foam in the current version. The Lightspeed plate (made of a renewable castor bean oil polymer ) is forked up front, and more propulsion-oriented. The Lightspeed stack can feel somewhat narrow and tall underfoot - especially when just standing around in them. With the narrow platform and propulsive plate combination - it’s clearly designed to work best when moving (fast).  One other note - the signature Fitlock strap feels particularly useful in the Lightspeed model - with such a narrow base directly beneath the arch. It noticeably hugs the inside of the foot (in a good way) and seems to really help with stability on landing.  Surprisingly my Lightspeed actually comes in heavier than the MAXx2 - 8.8 oz in the Lightspeed vs. 8.6 oz in the MAXx2. The difference is negligible on the run, but it’s surprising due to the fact that the shoe is noticeably narrower underfoot and visually slimmer across the upper. Possibly a difference in plate thickness, or just the thicker upper material of the Lightspeed? Speaking of which - the Lightspeed also uses oddly thick laces - kind of reminds me of hockey skate laces.  Renee: My MAXx2 weighs 22g more than my Lightspeed in the same size, so a different experience than Mike’s. I found the midsole to be top notch in terms of feel:  like a super version of Skechers Hyberburst foam. The plate is speedy, and there’s no doubt the shoe is meant for experienced and fast trail runners.  The narrow platform under the midfoot plus the super foam can make the landing fast on uneven terrain a bit unstable if the runner isn’t prepared. I never lost stability, but felt like I would whenever I was pushing the pace.  I understand the market being elite runners. The midsole and plate are what I’d expect from a road plated racer, and that also means some instability if the foot landing isn’t quick and sure. I’m a midpacker on trail, for reference. I tried strides getting down to a 4:30 min/mile pace, and the shoe is fast. That said, the ride felt quite uncontrollable. Jacob: The Lightspeed uses a new-for-VJ supercritical foam (SuperFoamance, also used in the MAXx 2) and has a stiff forked plate to direct energy. The stack height is medium—there is enough foam for comfortable cushion, but it’s far from a plush high-stack shoe. The foam is solid and light with some bounce, it’s an upgrade in ride on smooth terrain and in lower weight from past models for sure (covered more in Ride section). I think there is stability lost compared to VJs previous classic somewhat dead EVA and the narrow platform. The Lightspeed plate is very noticeable and is a good implementation for a shoe design for technical terrain. It isn’t as dramatic in propulsive effect or sense of bounding as a road plated shoe. For another comparison, it is more noticeable and obtrusive than the plate in the Hook Tecton X. The plate adds response and snappiness to the soft foam which helps increase cadence and feels good for trying to go fast on smooth terrain. When going slower or on rugged terrain, I wish for no plate (more specifically, I wish for the MAXx midsole with the Lightspeed fit, sizing, and upper). For me, the most remarkable part of the Lightspeed midsole is the narrowness of the platform at heel through midfoot. It’s really narrow for a trail shoe. It reminds me visually of the Nike Vaporfly 4%. If you’re running fast and on the forefoot, this is not a problem—it saves weight and encourages staying toward the front of the shoe. If running slower or when running with less focus on easy terrain (where I have a midfoot-heel landing), it is unstable. I wish it were wider for sure. Like Renee (unlike MIke), my sample of the MAXx 2 is significantly heavier than the Lightspeed. Adam:  This Lightspeed has a remarkably narrow platform for a trail shoe, similar to the Salomon Pulsar.  The tight upper and midfoot strap help stabilize it and the shoe doesn’t feel unstable, and this does help keep the foot positioning precise.  As a result, the shoe is much more comfortable being run on the mid/forefoot, placed set-by-step over technical terrain vs. cruising on smoother trails.   This is definitely a shoe that loves climbing, technical descents, and leaves me feeling in superb control.  The stiffness of the plate and relatively thin midsole does start to show over longer distances, and this isn’t a shoe I’d wear for a trail marathon.  Outsole Mike P: Not much to add here - you get the same 100% Butyl rubber outsole typical of all VJ models. In comparison to the MAXx2 - lugs are 0.5mm shorter at 3.5mm and they are square shaped as opposed to the chevrons of MAXx2. There are similar minor cutouts under the forefoot, but generally we have full coverage. Perhaps those slits are there to enable a little bit of lateral flex, given the plate and the softness of the midsole. Traction and grip is excellent in all conditions. I got to test them on dry ground, sand, soft mud, and even some snow. (BTW, I would not recommend them in snow, due to their narrowness - go with the spiked VJ Ace for those conditions (RTR Review).  As usual, nothing to be concerned about in the outsole department, all good, as with all VJ models.  Renee: I ran on muddy terrain and a bit of snow. I’ll agree with Mike that the shoes might not be the best option for snow, mostly because the snow dulls the plate to where it’s not as effective. The outsole worked great in mud and is the typical great grip you’d expect from VJ. The fit of the shoe itself doesn't feel narrow on foot, but the outsole and platform are clearly narrow. The grip is great but the narrow landing itself might be an issue for stability. Jacob: The outsole rubber is VJ’s typical butyl rubber and as usual provides 10/10 in traction in all conditions. Compared to many of VJ’s shoes, the Lightspeed has relatively shallow lugs (3.5mm). The outsole rubber is full coverage with slits for flexibility. The shallow lugs help with smoothing the ride on easier terrain and for the running I’ve done in testing with the Lightspeed. I ran on road, smooth trail, and technical, rock and root hopping signal track, including New England spring mud and the outsole has been excellent. It might help a bit, but because VJ rubber is so good, I haven’t felt like I needed deeper lugs.  Adam: The outsole is a highlight of this shoe, and redefines what grip means to me in a trail shoe.  It’s thin and lightweight, but gripped ferociously in the wettest and muddiest California conditions I tested it in. It’s limited by the lug depth (you won’t get grip in deep mud), but nothing will grip in deep mud and it does seem to clear clumping pretty easily.  I echo Jacob here that the rubber is so good, greater lug depth doesn’t feel necessary.  This is an outsole I wish I could transplant onto other shoes because it’s such a highlight. Ride, Conclusions and Recommendations Mike P: I’ve largely focused on comparing the Lightspeed to the MAXx2 throughout the review, as they share so many similar features and characteristics. But they are quite different shoes. The Lightspeed proved to be the quicker shoe in my testing. The plate made the biggest difference, as there’s a slightly firmer feel under the forefoot, and a bit more forward spring. When I say “firmer” - I do mean in comparison to the MAXx2, as this is not an objectively firm shoe by any means.  The SuperFoamance foam is probably one of the lightest/softest feeling foams in any trail shoe. This is particularly evident in the lateral heel. It’s extremely soft there, to the point of instability. This shoe really encourages you to be up on your toes, even during descents. Hard mashing of the heel, especially the very rear, can sometimes feel a bit harrowing. That leads to the stability factor. The shoe is narrow, tall, and bouncy. This combination doesn’t lead to inherent stability. The MAXx2, with its wider base, does a better job there, but even that shoe is still so soft underfoot, that it’s not the most rock-solid stable shoe underfoot either. But you really need to pay attention in uneven terrain with the Lightspeed. That super energetic bounce is great when going full speed ahead, but can be tricky if you place your foot in a wrong, uneven spot. This is where VJ was absolutely correct in describing this as a shoe designed for the “high level runner”. You need to be agile, forward leaning, and quick on your feet in order to get the most out of the ride while still feeling safe and stable. Given the dialed in, well-wrapping upper, I found them really fun to run in. I’d prefer them in situations when I’m feeling energetic and want to go out for a fast run. Generally speaking, the MAXx2 is the safer option, and without a doubt the more versatile shoe, but the Lightspeed is a blast! Mike P’s Score:  9.63 / 10 Ride: 10 - Fun, fast, lively, energetic - all the good things Fit: 9.5 - Super secure, conforming wrap with no hotspots. Nice heel cup Value: 8.5 - $200 is steep, but there is the less expensive, more versatile MAXx2 option Style: 9.5 - Love the bright midsole and the crisp white upper Traction: 10 - VJ’s trademark (copied from MAXx2 review) Rock Protection: 9.5 - Good and adequate, fits the profile/ride of the shoe (copied from MAXx2 review) Smiles 😊😊😊😊😊 Renee: Mike P has a great conclusion about the ride of the Lightspeed. The shoe is fast and best for runners who can control the narrow platform. The shoe isn’t uncomfortable underfoot at moderate or easy paces, it’s just that the plate works best for race paces. Otherwise, the MAXx2 is the better option.  I didn’t lose my footing but I felt unstable when running fast. I’m sort of mediocre, so runners seeking podium finishes at fancy racing events might disagree. If you can run fast from a consistent forefoot takeoff despite uneven terrain, then the shoe will be great. A slightly wider platform would make the shoe fantastic for mid packers. I had issues with irritation on my big toe because of the thick, rather inflexible upper. I’m also probably between half sizes in them so I imagine that’s a me issue and not a problem most runners will encounter.  Renee’s Score: 9.0/10 (.-40 narrow platform/instability, -.60 thick/unflexing upper) 😊😊😊😊 Jacob: The Lightspeed ride is well-rounded for a shoe intended for fast running. With supercritical foam and stiff plate, it does like to go fast especially with a forefoot strike and quick cadence. However, it isn’t dramatically rebounding or propulsive like a road racer. It’s fine for me at endurance paces as well. With the excellent fit and traction, it always leads to a good run, however, I do not choose it primarily for shorter, faster runs. The ride is quick and smooth for a trail shoe on the road or hard dirt paths; conditions previous VJ models were no fun. The shallow outsole lugs and softer foam contribute to this. On technical terrain, especially at easier paces, stability is a concern for me due to the narrow heel and midfoot. It’s a bit tippy and requires focus to run. The lateral heel, as Mike notes, is very soft and thus heel landings are sketchy. It’s not an effortless cruiser. When going faster, I shift toward a forefoot strike like most runners and it feels more stable, especially along with being precise with foot placement. The Lightspeed is great primarily because of the fit and traction. If the traction or fit were poor, I would never wear it.  For recommendations, I think it is a good choice for moderate or faster efforts on non-mountainous technical singletrack or mixed terrain that includes some technical and easier trail or road. It ranks even better against competitors if it’s wet. Also, I recommend it for racing non-ultra distances on technical trail. There is a local technical singletrack race series around me with distances of 10 to 20 km and I will race the Lightspeed for all those. I will also use it for weekly tempo to upper endurance door to trail. Jacob’s Score: 8.8 Ride: 8 (30%) Fit: 9.5 (30%) Value: 8 (10%)  Style: 7.5 (5%) Traction: 10 (15%)  Rock Protection: 9 (10%) 😊😊😊😊😊 Adam:  The Lightspeed is a shoe I grab when I know I’m going to go for a fast trail run.  They’re not as versatile as a door-to-trail shoe or more cushioned cruiser, but for fast climbs, slippery descents, and anywhere I’m running highly technical terrain for short to medium distances, they’re a joy to run in.  I tested these running a six peak loop around Mount Diablo (15 miles, ~6000 feet of climbing, and they performed admirably without a single slip.   .   I agree with Jacob that the fit and traction are the highlights, and reasons to wear this shoe over others.  When it’s slippery, I’m climbing steep technical terrain, or need the most control and precision for a descent, this is the shoe I’ll grab Adam’s Score: 8.6 / 10 Ride: 8 (30%) Fit: 9.5 (30%) Value: 8 (10%)  Style: 9  (5%) Traction: 11 (15%)  Rock Protection: 9 (10%) 😊😊😊😊😊 6 Comparisons Index to all RTR reviews: HERE   NNormal Kjerag (RTR Review) Mike P (9.5): Kjerag also uses a Nitrogen infused supercritical foam but it does feel and is by stack height way thinner underfoot and less bouncy and dynamic. It’s really a minimalist trail shoe compared to most trail shoes. Kjerag is similarly narrow under the midfoot and heel, but wider under the forefoot (and also in the toebox). It’s more stable and controllable, but, as mentioned earlier - thinner underfoot so you’ll need Kilian level feet to use them in overly technical terrain. If you’re ok being lower to the ground, it’s a more versatile shoe. Lightspeed will be faster in a straight-ahead race. S/Lab Pulsar SG (RTR Review) Mike P (9.5): I only have the original OG (gray) Pulsar. The Pulsar is amazingly a full 2+ oz lighter, and really feels that way. It’s Matryx upper and quicklaces must be much lighter than the Lightspeed upper/laces. Pulsar OG fit is yet tighter than the Lightspeed, borderline squeezy at the toes, where the Lightspeed is more compliant. Both shoes have similar narrow platforms and are somewhat unstable, relying on the ability of the runner for control. Lightspeed midsole feels bouncier and more dynamic, the sheer low weight and rocker of the Pulsar probably keeps it a faster shoe. VJ Spark (RTR Review) Renee: The Spark was a fun shoe for speed work, especially on inclines. The midsole has some softness to it, just enough to be comfortable given the low stack and somewhat aggressive lugs. The Spark is the heavier shoe, by far. For performance, distance, and variable terrain, the Lightspeed is much better. Sizing was much different for me. I wore a women’s 8 in the Spark and the length was just right, although shorter as compared to other brands and with a shallow toebox. My women’s size 8 in the Lightspeed is a tad too long, causing some discomfort over my toe where my feet flex.  Mike P (10.5): Note the drastic size difference here. Spark does have one of the better, more footshaped toeboxes from VJ, so I could likely get away with a 10.0, but no lower than that. The Spark toebox is wider and more rounded - comfortable due to its shape, while the Lightspeed toebox is narrower but with a better wrap. The Lightspeed feels more dialed in. Spark used an odd rubbery insole which gave a bit too much movement at times (and heavy), while the Lightspeed has just a thin liner, so you really feel locked in to the footbed. The Spark was super flexible, probably having an edge in grip, but is far less dynamic and runnable. It is good for OCR, and some short technical runs, but the Lightspeed is a much better shoe. Jacob: The Spark is a similar shoe in usage being light and best for faster paces. The Lightspeed is better in most ways due to its better ride and more toe space. The Spark is a bit low stack for my preferences and doesn’t have nearly the energetic, bouncy, soft feel as the Lightspeed. The Spark is harsh on road while the Lightspeed is decent. The Spark is more stable (though still a narrow platform) and the lugs more sharp and deeper. I wear the same size in both but unlike Renee this size is ideal in both. The Spark is shorter with less space around my toes.  VJ MAXx2 (RTR Review) Renee: The Lightspeed is a light shoe, and more dynamic in terms of performance and speed (both shoes are lightweight given the great outsoles and midsoles). The midsole geometry is more pronounced in the Lightspeed, even more so because of the plate. For mellow running and stability, the MAXx2 might work better, but I prefer the fun and fast ride of the Lightspeed. Sizing for both was tricky for me as someone who is often between half sizes. For both, if already between half sizes, I suggest the half size down.  Mike P (9.0): As mentioned in the review - note the weird sizing. It’s the only shoe (road or trail) that I have in a size 9.0. MAXx2 is one of the best all-around trail shoes out right now, and also beats the Lightspeed in overall versatility. It has the same great foam, fun bouncy feel, yet it’s slightly wider and more stable for everyday/fast/moderate runs. Hard to really put a limit on them, whereas the Lightspeed is really just built for going fast. Somehow the MAXx2 is even slightly lighter. If you had to choose 1, I’d recommend the MAXx2, no doubt. But I still really like the Lightspeed, it’s just a different shoe.  Jacob: They are similar shoes as the foam is the same, rubber the same, and the stack heights very close. The biggest differences for me is sizing and stability. I have the MAXx2 in the same size as the Lightspeed (my typical US 12) but it is unfortunately too large. I need at least a half size down in the MAXx2. I like the 12 in the Lightspeed. I made several comparisons throughout the review, but as a summary, the MAXx is more versatile and more stable. The Lightspeed is more fun when going fast—it’s easier to run—and has better heel hold, but the narrow heel and slow-speed instability limits its versatility. Merrell Skyfire 2 Matryx (RTR Review) Mike P (9.5): These shoes are so similar in terms of platform and even outsole. Very narrow underfoot, tapered under the midfoot with a slim heel, also narrow under the forefoot. The Skyfire 2 has less rubber underfoot, but good solid lugs that offer great traction. The Skyfire is and does feel way thinner underfoot – you really feel like you’re putting full force straight into the ground in that shoe. Probably a top pick for something like a VK event but very firm and thin in other scenarios. The Lightspeed is the opposite - very soft underfoot, and therefore has way less ground feel and is way less stable. Lightspeed offers straight “speed’ while Skyfire 2 offers zero ground interference and hence supreme agility. Renee: I agree with Mike. The platforms are similar although the Lightspeed has more midsole and is more comfortable for running longer distances. The Lightspeed is faster on mellow terrain, but the Skyfire is more stable with an easier to controllable, more agile landing. I wore the same size in both but had no issues with comfort in the Skyfire as opposed to a lot of discomfort in the Lightspeed over my big toe.  New Balance SC Trail Brooks Catamount Agil (RTR Review) Mike P (9.5): Just wrapped up my testing on this one (review very soon). I find sizing about the same - I’m perfect in a US 9.5 for both. The Agil is quite a bit lighter - 8.0 oz / 227g  vs 8.8 oz / 249g The Agil has less stack, therefore lower to the ground with great ground feel - but not the harshness of the Skyfire 2. It’s probably sits somewhere in the middle of the Skyfire 2 and the Lightspeed. The Brooks DNA Flash 2 foam feels just as responsive, there’s just less of it underfoot, and the Agil also has a wider base, particularly under the midfoot. It’s is therefore the more controllable and a much more stable shoe. I’d say a lot more versatile too. Speedwise, it could be a dead heat - depends if you prefer the soft bounciness of the Lightspeed or the responsive, closer to the ground feel of the Agil.  Renee: Sizing is similar but I found the toebox wider in the Agil. Both have unflexing upper material over the toebox, but the Agil has a lighter upper as compared to the thick Lightspeed. For distances, the Lightspeed midsole is better, and it can be unstable because of the narrow platform and plate. For ground feel, the Agil wins out.  Index to all RTR reviews (Many 100's of them!): HERE The VJ Lightspeed is available from VJ Shoes HERE & RUNNING WAREHOUSE US Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Tester Profiles Mike Postaski currently focuses on long mountainous ultras - anywhere from 50K up to his favorite - 100M. 5'10", 138 lbs, midfoot/forefoot striker - he typically averages 70 mpw (mostly on trails), ramping up to 100+ mpw during race buildups. A recent 2:39 road marathoner, his easy running pace ranges from 7:30 - 9:00/mi. From 2022-23 Mike has won the Standhope 100M, IMTUF 100M, and Scout Mountain 100M trail ultras. He also set a CR of 123.74M at the Pulse Endurance Runs 24H and completed the Boise Trails Challenge on foot in 3 days 13 hours, besting the previous record by 7 hours. Mike's shoe preferences lean towards firmer, dense cushioning, and shoes with narrower profiles. He prefers extra forefoot space, especially for long ultras, and he strongly dislikes pointy toe boxes. Renee is a former U.S.Marine journalist, which is when her enjoyment of running and writing started. She isn’t that awesome of a runner, but she tries really hard. Most of her weekly 50-60 miles take place on rural country roads in Nebraska, meaning mud, gravel, dirt, hills, and the occasional field. She has PR’s of 1:30:59 for the half marathon and 3:26:45 for the marathon. Jacob is a runner and general endurance sports enthusiast. He runs a mix of roads and trails in the Portland, Maine area. He has been running every day for over five years and averaging 50 miles per week. Jacob races on road and trail at a variety of distances from 5k to 50mi. He has a PR of 2:49 in the marathon. In addition to running, he does hiking, biking (mountain/gravel/road), sport climbing, and nordic skiing. He is 28 years old, 6 ft / 182 cm tall and 155 lbs / 70 kg. You can check out Jacob’s recent activities on Strava. Adam is a cross country skier, runner, cyclist, and fan of outdoor adventures.  He grew up in New Hampshire, where he competed at NCAAs for Dartmouth Skiing, but is now based out of the Bay Area in California, where he enjoys the trails, cuisine, and engineering.  Adam enjoys running and racing track, road, and trail over a variety of distances.  He is 24 years old, 6ft /183 cm tall, and 197 lbs/ 89 kg.  Check out my Strava Samples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased via shopping links in this article. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Comments and Questions Welcome Below! Please let us know mileage, paces, race distances, and current preferred shoes RoadTrailRun Official Store Custom Fractel Caps and Bucket Hats Cap:$39                                                             Bucket:$49 Limited Release! SHOP HERE RUNNING WAREHOUSE EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Europe only: use RTR code RTR5ALL for 5% off all products, even sale products  AUSTRALIA Men's & Women's SHOP HERE ROADRUNNERSPORTS Men's and Women's SHOP HERE FLEET FEET Men's & Women's SHOP HERE REI  Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE BACKCOUNTRY Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE TOP4RUNNING EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Use RTR code RTRTOP4 for 5% off all products, even sale products SPORTSSHOES.COM UK/EU SHOP HERE Use our code RTR235 for 5% off all products MARATHON SPORTS BOSTON Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE MOOSEJAW Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE AMAZON   Men's & Women's SHOP HERE WATCH OUR YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE ROADTRAILRUN CHANNEL Find all RoadTrailRun reviews at our index page HERE  Google "roadtrailrun Shoe Name" and you can be quite sure to find just about any run shoe over the last 10 years Enjoyed this post? Never miss out on future posts by Following RoadTrailRun News Feed Please Like and Follow RoadTrailRun Facebook: RoadTrailRun.com  Instagram: @roadtrailrun You Tube: @RoadTrailRun