“So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.” -Genesis 1:27 Size: Model is 5'6" and wearing a size Small.Fit: Relaxed, Unisex FitColor: IndigoComposition: 70% Cotton, 30% PolyesterFeatures: Garment Dyed, Super Soft, Pre-Shrunk
Royalty-free image download of the painting Agnus Dei, the Lamb of God by Francisco de Zurbaran.
Esta sección puede considerarse propia de mentalidades ADULTAS, pero si a pesar de ello le molesta la exhibición del cuerpo humano desnudo o en situaciones de erotismo explícito, por favor, opte por mirar otras secciones más adecuadas a sus intereses personales. Gracias. Esta sección del blog contiene material para adultos por lo tanto, si eres menor de edad, cierra la ventana. No había conciencia del Mal (ni del Bien) hasta que el ser humano habitó la Tierra. Fue la percepción de su realidad "no fijada" la que le hizo discriminar y valorar. ¿Tentación? ¿Pecado necesario? ¿Realidad óntica? Muchas explicaciones -pocas, muy pocas, convincentes- para lo que algunos han llamado "el drama de la libertad" (Safranski). Pero más allá de explicaciones -que rara vez consiguen su objetivo- los humanos preferimos imágenes. Las imágenes hablan en su propio lenguaje al alma. De ahí la necesidad de personalizar al Mal. Si en el post anterior mencionamos a Lilith, diablesa juguetona y perversa, hoy le toca a Lucifer. El diablo por excelencia (diabolos, el que divide), el ángel caído y el más bello de la creación, el que osó desafiar a su creador, el que -según nos cuentan- nos tienta y nos arrastra al Mal con mayúsculas. Curiosamente la fascinación que ejerce ha mudado de las imágenes del horror y el espanto (personificación de miedos ancestrales) a la "plástica" iconografía del deseo: hoy se nos muestra con el poderío de la seducción más que con el temor propio de la horripilación. Cabanel Alex Stevenson. André Durand. Ocio Inteligente: para vivir mejor: André Durand: Mythologies Part IV (ociointeligenteparavivirmejor.blogspot.com) Ocio Inteligente: para vivir mejor: André Durand: Mythologies Part III. (ociointeligenteparavivirmejor.blogspot.com) Ocio Inteligente: para vivir mejor: Pintores de hoy (50): Daniel Barkley (1962) /2. (ociointeligenteparavivirmejor.blogspot.com) Arantzazu Martinez. Ocio Inteligente: para vivir mejor: Pintores de hoy (18): Aranzatzu Martinez (1977) (ociointeligenteparavivirmejor.blogspot.com) Agostino Arrivabene Ocio Inteligente: para vivir mejor: Pintores de hoy (7): Agostino Arrivabene (1967) (ociointeligenteparavivirmejor.blogspot.com) F. von Stuck. Gustave Doré R. Ferri. Ocio Inteligente: para vivir mejor: Pintores de hoy (4): Roberto Ferri (1978) (ociointeligenteparavivirmejor.blogspot.com) Ocio Inteligente: para vivir mejor: Pintores de hoy (17): Roberto Ferri/ 2 (y el sentido de un cierto tipo de pintura) (ociointeligenteparavivirmejor.blogspot.com) Miniatura medieval. G. Geefs. Ricardo Bellver. W. Blake. Desde el Renacimiento hasta nuestros días: 11. William Blake (1757-1827). (desdeelrenacimientohastanuestrosdias.blogspot.com) Mihaly Zichy. Odilon Redon Desde el Renacimiento hasta nuestros días: 1. Odilon Redon (1840, Burdeos-1916, París). (desdeelrenacimientohastanuestrosdias.blogspot.com) Desde el Renacimiento hasta nuestros días: 5.ODILON REDON (1840-1916) Pintor simbolista. (Vídeo). (desdeelrenacimientohastanuestrosdias.blogspot.com) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XfYgTymws4 La obra provocadora. Sexo y erotismo en el arte.: Cristóbal López. Chile, 1981. Arte "macabro". Todas las imágenes y/o vídeos que se muestran corresponden al artista o artistas referenciados. Su exposición en este blog pretende ser un homenaje y una contribución a la difusión de obras dignas de reconocimiento cultural, sin ninguna merma a los derechos que correspondan a sus legítimos propietarios. En ningún caso hay en este blog interés económico directo ni indirecto. Javier Nebot
Nüwa was a serpent deity from ancient Chinese mythology. Sometimes she is pictured as a gorgeous woman, other times she is shown possessing a woman’s head but the body of a powerful snake. Nüwa was…
Unconsciously, secularism is predicated on believing in Original Innocence, rather than Original Sin. This supposition explains many things ...
The Levels of Mankind & The Seal of Melchizedek Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author ...
(SELECT REFRESH TO RE-START SLIDE-SHOWS) Enki With Other Gods, Etc., Slide-Show: (SELECT REFRESH TO RE-START SLIDE-SHOWS) Enki, God of Waters as Dagon, Wearing the "Fish's Suit" - Wet Suit, Slide-Show: (SELECT REFRESH TO RE-START SLIDE-SHOWS) Enki, Texts: (A MUST READ! – UNALTERED – EYE OPENING!) (gods in blue … mixed-breed demigods in teal) Enki Overview (
Plato thought of ways he could improve society. He wrote about utopia, an imaginary place where governments and social conditions are perfect.
On the eve of a major exhibition on the printmaker, painter and poet, Fiona Maddocks chooses her 10 favourite works
Oannes and the Annedoti The ancient history of the Sumerians, Assyrians and Babylonians all are dominated by reliefs of figures that feature a 1/2 human 1/2 fish resemblance. The figurines above came from Nineveh, that show the creature 1/2 fish 1/2 man Oannes. The original text has been lost, but was later recorded with diligence by an ancient Greek named Berossus, that was first translated in 1876. The text records the traditional history of mankind known by the Babylonians. Their development was possible because of the knowledge that was given to mankind by an Amphibious creature, 1/2 man and 1/2 fish, named Oannes. Oannes was from the Musari or the Annedoti creatures. Oannes first appeared to mankind during the reign of Ammenon of Babylon. The word, "Annedoti" means repulsive, while the word "Mursarus" means abomination. Evidently Oannes and the Annedoti were extremely offensive to mankind. They were literally ugly monsters, that repulsed man, but were totally benign. What Oannes did was to depart to man knowledge. The text below is part of that translation; In the first year there made its appearance, from a part of the Erythraean sea which bordered upon Babylonia, an animal endowed with reason, who was called Oannes. (According to the account of Apollodorus) the whole body of the animal was like that of a fish; and had under a fish's head another head, and also feet below, similar to those of a man, subjoined to the fish's tail. His voice too, and language, was articulate and human; and a representation of him is preserved even to this day. This Being in the day-time used to converse with men; but took no food at that season; and he gave them an insight into letters and sciences, and every kind of art. He taught them to construct houses, to found temples, to compile laws, and explained to them the principles of geometrical knowledge. He made them distinguish the seeds of the earth, and showed them how to collect fruits; in short, he instructed them in every thing which could tend to soften manners and humanize mankind. From that time, so universal were his instructions, nothing has been added material by way of improvement. When the sun set, it was the custom of this Being to plunge again into the sea, and abide all night in the deep; for he was amphibious. After this there appeared other animals like Oannes, of which Berossus promises to give an account when he comes to the history of the kings. NOTE; The Erythraean Sea is now called the Arabian Sea. Can the history of man be believed from the stories, myths traditions of ancient people. Is it possible that at the very beginning there existed 2 distinct species of mankind? They were able to coexist. Enki's, the Sumerian God, in the relief above, pictures him atop his Ziggurat, with his signature water pouring form his image. This water depicts his power over the Abzu. The Ziggurats were thought to have large basins of water, at their top. Were the Abzu, and their water ceremony, more than just a religious act, but a significant part of the these Great Gods life? Were the Abzu necessary for the Great Gods existence? Just as Oannes had to return each night to live in the Ocean, did the Anunnaki have to return to the Abzu, which contained a transformed water, since they were a considerable distance from the Ocean. Here is shown a Great God ascending out of the Abzu which is located atop the Ziggurat. In Canaan, Dagan is seen as a half fish, and there are reliefs throughout the ancient world that show a half man, half fish God, that is thought to be Dagan.. Could it be that the Anunnaki take a form other than man in the underworld? Is Dagan one such creature? In Exodus 33:20, Yahweh is speaking to Moses; "No man can see me and live". Is the reason that Dagan/Yahweh is unwilling to show himself, is that he is an abomination to mankind? That his appearance doesn't project an image of worship, but projects horror. The ancient figure below illustrates Dagan. In the Sumerian language, priest or priestess, has been translated, into the word "changeling". The Sumerians, in their reliefs of the Anunnaki were again merely drawing what they observed, or were they myths? Were the Annunaki able to transform into a human form? The fishman figure below were common in the ancient world. What makes the stories believable is that these fish like humans were drawn in reliefs throughout ancient history, and that they were considered an abomination by man. If you were writing a myth, why would you make these creatures repulsive to man, and yet beneficial? For further information on the ABZU of Sumeria go to blog site; http://trueancienthistory.blogspot.ca/2013/05/the-sumerian-abzu.html
Our site—Walk in the Light—provides rich devotional resources on various Bible study topics, such as Bible Prophecy, Second Coming of Jesus, and The Rapture, helping you go deeper into the Bible.
Hunger to know St. Thomas Aquinas teaches that we have a natural desire for God. This desire has its origin in our intellects, so it is not like the bodily desire for food or drink or the desire to flee from harm or lash out at someone who angers us. It is more like the […]
We know the tragic story at the beginning of the book of Ruth: in a span of 10 years, a woman names Naomi loses not just her husband, but also her two grown sons and is left to put back the pieces. She decides to move back to her homeland of Bethlehem from Moab where she had settled many years before. Naomi urges both of her daughters-in-law to stay behind with the hope that they could marry again. One of them, Ruth, says absolutely not and in one of the most beautiful promises of devotion found in Scripture says: “Where
Niet alleen zien jonge kleuters al verschillen in huidskleur, ze gaan deze ook associëren met ‘beter’ of ‘slechter’. Op basis van huidskleur worden zo zelfs in de kleuterklas vaak vrienden gekozen en klasgenoten uitgesloten van activiteiten (Boudry & Vandenbroeck, 2006; Swanson et al., 2009, Winkler, 2009).
