Sustainable drainage in Cambridgeshire

Dams, Darcy, Henry, Data, Databases, and Decision-Support Systems, Davis, William Morris, Demand Management, Desalinization, Desert Hydrology, Developing Countries, Issues in, Douglas, Marjory Stoneman, Drinking Water and Society, etc…

Idaho faces several major water issues, primarily related to water availability, management, and quality. As one of the most water-dependent states in the West, Idaho’s economy and environment rely heavily on its rivers, aquifers, and snowpack, but increasing demand, climate change, and pollution threaten its long-term water security. 1. Water Scarcity and Allocation Idaho’s water supply primarily comes from mountain snowpack, which feeds into the Snake River and underground aquifers. However, prolonged droughts, earlier snowmelt, and increased water consumption for agriculture, industry, and a growing population have stressed these resources. The Eastern Snake Plain Aquifer, a vital groundwater source for farmers, has been overdrawn for decades, leading to conflicts between surface water users and groundwater pumpers. Water rights disputes are common, as farmers, cities, and environmental groups compete for limited supplies. 2. Climate Change and Drought Warming temperatures have altered Idaho’s hydrology, causing reduced snowpack, earlier runoff, and more frequent droughts. This shift affects irrigation, hydroelectric power generation, and river flows that support fish and wildlife. The Snake River, which powers much of Idaho’s economy and agriculture, faces reduced water levels that threaten both farming operations and endangered species, such as salmon, that rely on cold, flowing water. 3. Water Quality Concerns Agricultural runoff, industrial pollution, and urban development contribute to water contamination in Idaho’s rivers and lakes. High levels of phosphorus and nitrogen from fertilizers have led to algae blooms, particularly in the Snake River and reservoirs like Lake Lowell. Groundwater contamination, often from nitrate pollution, has been a growing concern in rural areas, affecting drinking water supplies. Additionally, legacy mining operations have left toxic heavy metals in some water bodies, posing health risks to communities and ecosystems. Addressing Idaho’s water issues requires balancing agricultural needs, conservation efforts, and sustainable management practices. State and federal policies are increasingly focused...Read more

Read sample

Sustainable water management features (bioswales, ditches, rills/runnels, permeable pavement &c) from Slow Ottawa. Visit 30 more sustainability-themed boards at www.pinterest.com/slowottawa/

Learn about snow hydrology. How do scientists research snow? Why is snow research important? These questions and more are answered.

cultural – Hidden Hydrology

Handbook of Hydrology [Maidment, David R.] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Handbook of Hydrology

PRICES MAY VARY. Vadose Zone Hydrology describes the elements of the physical processes most often encountered by hydrogeologists and ground-water engineers in their vadose zone projects. It illustrates the application of soil physics to practical problems relevant to the characterization and monitoring of the vadose zone. It includes an introduction to physical processes, including basic flow theory, and provides examples of important field-scale processes that must be recognizable by hydrogeologists. Considerable attention is given to the concepts of recharge, including how it is most accurately evaluated in the vadose zone. Field and laboratory methods for characterizing hydraulic properties in the vadose zone are also covered, and case studies illustrating these methods are provided. New and emerging technologies for monitoring the vadose zone, particularly for the purpose of detecting contaminants, are highlighted. In the last section of the book, additional case studies are presented, demonstrating applications related to seepage detection, landfill monitoring, and soil gas investigations. This book is written from the perspective of hydrogeologists and is designed to be directly applicable and to maintain continuity and consistency between chapters. It will be an invaluable primer for environmental or geotechnical consultants, regulators, or students who have no prior formal academic training in unsaturated flow concepts. Because the text contains some of the latest advances in this field, it will be an excellent reference for geologists and engineers currently working on problems of vadose zone hydrology. Markiere, mache dir Notizen und suche im Buch In dieser Ausgabe entsprechen die Seitenzahlen denen der Buchausgabe in Papierform.

We typically see yellowing of leaves in response to over or under watering, and/or nutrient deficiencies. Water should be applied when needed (according to weather conditions and plant size) rather than on a fixed schedule. When applied, water deeply (fewer times per week as opposed to daily) and maintain even soil moisture (avoid fluctuations in very dry and very wet/flooding of soil). Insufficient water dries out roots, and too much water drowns roots; both situations result in a lack of nutrient uptake. We've included a link about Cucumbers so you can refer to this for appropriate fertilizer applications. If watering is done properly and leaves are still yellow you can use this rule of thumb: uniformly yellow lower/older leaves means a lack of Nitrogen. Yellow areas between the veins on newer leaves (at the top of the plant) results from a lack of Iron. We recommend you ask your local garden center professional for an appropriate fertilizer. Here' the link: http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/GARDEN/VEGES/cucumbers.html

Chique Home Living is an interior design and lifestyle blog that aspires to be your number one go-to source for contemporary living. We share informative, consistent, and carefully selected home interior design and lifestyle contents.

Buy Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis 5 by Bedient, Philip B., Huber, Wayne C., Vieux, Baxter E. (ISBN: 9780132567961) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.

Remarkable, organic, and complexly chaotic still life photographs of formations in ice, by Douglas Capron

Studio Marco Vermeulen is a design office for architecture, urban design, landscape and design research. We are located at an outer dike location alongside the river Maas in the center of Rotterdam.

It’s a complicated time to be an electricity-generating company in the United States. Volatility in the natural gas market is forcing utility planners to rethink fueling options, and new emissions regulations are adding even more questions to their long-term forecasts. Now water is becoming a critical component in plant siting and relicensing, as well, and its importance likely will rise should current drought conditions continue.


A recent report by The River Network, a Portland, Ore.-based environmental group, helps illustrate why water is a concern. According to their study, “Burning Our Rivers: The Water Footprint of Electricity,” the U.S. Geological Survey has found that 53 percent of all fresh surface water withdrawn for human use in 2005 went to operate our electrical grid. And the report estimates that 42 gallons go into every kilowatt-hour (kWh) we use.


Figures such as these become especially important when, as in August 2012, lack of rain forced officials to list more than half the nation’s counties as natural disaster areas. As of mid-January, the National Climate Data Center reporterd that moderate to exceptional drought covered 34.4 percent of the contiguous United States. In some areas, power plant operators face opposition from municipalities and farmers as each group seeks to advance its own water needs.


“As water resources become maybe more scarce, then those competing demands become even more significant,” said Richard Breckenridge, a senior project manager with the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) focused on power-plant water issues. “We’re all competing for it, and we all need to use it as wisely as possible.”


There are concerns, not only about how much water generating plants consume, but also the quality of the water they return to the environment since these plants send most of the water they withdraw back into surrounding waterways. So-called “once-through cooling systems,” though becoming less common, often release water that can be 20 degrees warmer than its original temperature, which can be devastating to surrounding fish and plant life. And water that’s been used to wash sulfur and other pollutants out of airborne emissions may carry some of those pollutants into other waters.


“I think water right now is just seen as a risk factor, rather than as an input that has real value,” said Wendy Wilson, water and energy project director with The River Network and a co-author of the report. “The tradeoffs have to be made site by site, watershed by watershed.”


All thermoelectric generating stations—that heat steam to drive turbines, including coal, natural gas and nuclear plants—use significant quantities of water to produce electricity. Of these, nuclear and coal power plants top the list in both water withdrawal and consumption, according to The River Network study. A nuclear plant, according to an average weighted by the number of plants using different cooling technologies, withdraws 14,732 gallons per megawatt-hour (gal/MWh) and consumes 532 gal/MWh. A coal plant withdraws 15,514 gal/MWh and consumes 506 gal/MWh. By comparison, the latest generation of combined-cycle natural gas plants withdraws (by weighted average) 1,170 gal/MWh and consumes 95 gal/MWh.


Such figures put coal-plant owners in an especially tight bind. These stations still supply more of our electricity than any other fuel source—37 percent in 2012 (though dropping quickly), according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. However, a combination of falling natural gas prices and new emissions regulations are leading generating companies to close coal plants in large numbers. Add water-use concerns to this mix, and the technology’s days seem even more numbered.


Electric utilities recognize that water use could have as big an effect as airborne emissions in the near future. In fact, engineering leader Black & Veatch found water supply to be second only to carbon emissions as a top environmental concern for utility leaders in its June 2012 report, “Strategic Directions in the U.S. Electric Industry.” In Texas, especially hard-hit by drought, water use tops that list. When concerns about water effluent are combined with water supply worries, the full range of water issues tops even carbon emissions.


Even more important in the conversation regarding new plant siting, water issues—including ground-water quality, effluent and a plant’s projected water requirements—take three of the top seven considerations in utility resource planning efforts. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed new regulations under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act governing the operations of cooling-water intake structures. The new standards, which the EPA hopes to finalize by June 2013, could require some plants that currently depend on once-through cooling to add a cooling tower and expense that operators of older plants might not be willing to pay.


“We see longer term water issues beginning to be a concern but not universally,” said Chris Vlahoplus, a partner with Raleigh, N.C.-based ScottMadden, a management consulting firm that focuses on energy industry issues. “The industry as a whole is beginning to awaken to the broader issue and only now beginning to get its arms around this bigger picture.”


And that big picture shifts, depending on where plants are—or potentially could be—sited. For nuclear-plant operators in the Northeast, such as Exelon (New Jersey’s Oyster Creek station) and Entergy (New York’s Indian Point station), returned-water temperature might be the primary issue. But for coal-plant owners, particularly any company operating a coal plant in drought-stricken Texas, water consumption is the critical concern.


“The severity of the issue depends upon the local conditions for the generating plants. This highlights the importance of having an understanding of the unique local situation for a utility’s assets,” Vlahoplus said.


In fact, drought-related, low water levels can have an almost immediate impact on a plant’s operations if states start limiting the amount of water that plant is allowed to withdraw. Lower cooling- or scrubbing-water supplies can force the plant to reduce its generating capacity. Hotter weather can create similar capacity reductions (or “derating,” a reduction from rated capacity). For example, 2012’s persistent Midwest heat wave raised the temperature of the Mississippi River, the cooling-water source for the Cordova, Ill.-based Quad Cities nuclear plant, which forced operator Exelon to pursue EPA variances for resulting higher water-discharge temperatures.


As Vlahoplus said, utilities are beginning to recognize the importance water will have in their future operations. For example, generation site owners are ramping up research, investigating new technologies that could help reduce their plants’ water “footprint.” Among these are two major efforts headed up by the EPRI.


The larger of these programs is taking place at Plant Bowen, owned and operated by Georgia Power, a Southern Co. subsidiary. This 3,500-megawatt (MW) plant in Cartersville, Ga., is the largest coal-fired generating station in the United States. Georgia Power and EPRI are launching the Water Research Center (WRC) there to look at a range of advanced technologies for operating cooling systems, scrubbers and carbon-capture systems.


“A lot of the research is completely applicable to all sorts of generation,” Breckenridge said. However, he added, waste­water treatment findings will be primarily focused on coal. 


“The importance [can be judged] by the number of major utilities that have joined this effort already,” said Jeff Brehm, EPRI spokesperson. “They look at water as the new air.”


Since the project was announced, 13 additional utilities—including such major players as AEP, Duke, Edison International and Arizona Public Service—have joined Georgia Power in funding this research.


Reducing water use in cooling operations is one area of the WRC’s work that will be useful to a range of generating technologies. The systems supplying turbines with steam generally operate in a closed loop in which water loss is minimal. However, that loop has to incorporate a cooling cycle for the condensed steam before it is returned to the turbine area for reuse. In many cases, plants run that closed loop through cooler water within a cooling tower, which can lead to cooling-water evaporation and create wastewater that’s too warm for surrounding aquaculture on discharge. The WRC recently initiated an investigation into alternative cooling methods, including a hybrid approach combining a cooling tower and a Johnson Controls chiller system to supplement the cooling tower during cooler times of the year.


Among other targets, the WRC will work to quantify the energy required for such alternate cooling methods. 


“Many times to recover water involves some form of energy,” Breckenridge said, adding that there’s a tradeoff in how much water you can save, compared with how much energy is expended.


For example, Breckenridge noted, dry cooling, which uses air instead of water to cool steam, can reduce total power plant water consumption significantly. However, this water savings comes with an efficiency penalty of 5 to 10 percent, meaning less electricity is produced per unit of fuel. There is hope the hybrid system WRC will investigate will be more water-efficient without an unacceptably high-efficiency penalty.


EPRI’s second major water initiative, Water Prism, is supporting the development of an evaluation tool to help balance the competing demands on a specific region’s water supply in an effort to improve overall water-management decisions. This software-based product is being developed to help run test scenarios on alternative water-use plans and is being tested in real-life applications in water-constrained regions of the southeastern United States.


And the EPRI isn’t alone in developing such analytical aids. ScottMadden’s Vlahoplus noted Regional Watershed Risk Analysis Platform developed by the Research Triangle Park, N.C.-based RTI International (RTI). Abbreviated “R-Wrap,” this package melds expertise in hydrology and geographic information systems to categorize water-supply vulnerability in specific regional watersheds. RTI’s researchers see water-use drawing increased scrutiny from state regulatory agencies that are just beginning to recognize just how limited their water supplies might actually be.


“States are putting in place much more rigorous water-withdrawal permitting,” said Bob Dykes, director of RTI’s Water and Ecosystems Management Center. “Utilities will face an increasingly [more] difficult process to withdraw water [than] they have in the past.”


Helping researchers, resource managers, and the general public better understand and appreciate Florida's water resources

An extended discussion of window construction wood joinery and water management. June 18, 2010

The safest and most inclusive global community of photography enthusiasts. The best place for inspiration, connection, and sharing!