The 9-month-old Santa Cruz Heckler gets a newer, lighter motor and the MX edition has a 29er front end.

Article by Renee Krusmark and Jeremy Marie Diadiora Frequenza ($180) Introduction The Frequenza from Diadora is a light and flexible daily training to uptempo trainer with a supercritical EVA foam midsole. At 8.15 oz  / 231 g (US9) with a reasonable stack height of 30 mm heel / 22 mm forefoot in a time where max cushion is all the rage, it promises fast fun! Pros: Light weight: Renee, Jeremy Great midsole for both easy and uptempo runs: Renee, Jeremy Flexible despite the stack height. Jeremy Cons: Price: Renee Overbuilt heel: Renee Lace color bleeds, beware your socks: Jeremy Heel may lack a bit of stability for some due to soft foam: Jeremy Most comparable shoes Hylo Impact Nike Invincible Run 1 and 2 and not 3 New Balance Rebel v4 ASICS Novablast 4 Puma Liberate Nitro Stats Approx. Weight: men's 8.15 oz  / 231 g (US9)  /  women's 7.20 oz / 204g  (US8)   Samples: men’s  7.94 oz / 225g  US8.5 ,  oz / g US , 8.99 oz / 255g (US10.5)                   women’s 7.20 oz / 204g US8 Stack Height: men’s 30 mm heel / 22 mm forefoot ( 8mm drop spec)  Platform Width: 80 mm heel / 70 mm midfoot / 105 mm forefoot $180 Available now. First Impressions, Fit and Upper Renee: I had zero expectations for the Frequenza. My only other Diadora shoe is the Equipe Sestriere XT, which although pretty, is heavy and clunky. I was overwhelmingly happy with the Frequenza and if it had a Nike swoosh on the side, I think people would be flocking to wear it. I had no issues getting more than 50 miles in the shoes for review, running between 6 and 10 milers. Every run was enjoyable. The shoe is lightweight at only 7.20oz in a women’s size 8. The upper is light and breathable, with a good amount of padding across the heel that is on par with other daily trainers used for the occasional tempo run. I thought the heel was a bit overbuilt for my preference, but that’s coupled with an 8mm that feels more than 10mm to me. The tongue is not gusseted. Perhaps this was a quality control issue, but in my pair the tongue material is rather thick where it’s sewn into the upper, which caused some irritation. That’s my only negative about the shoe. For sizing, true-to-size. If between half sizes, I suggest the half size up to account for the somewhat angled toebox (plenty of room in the toebox for me). Jeremy: Diadora still resonates as a lifestyle brand for me, despite their recent incursion into the running shoe territory. While reading the specs sheet of the Frequenza my interest skyrocketed: Supercritical EVA foam, lightweight, generous stack, and a style that I found quite to my taste. The shoe is comfy, and that’s an understatement. Generous padding around the heel, a nice shape that holds my feet very well with adequate room for the toes, and a good midfoot lockdown even increased my “on paper” expectations for this model. The fit is TTS, and I suggest sticking to Diadora’s size guide. At first contact the foam feels very soft and bouncy. It reminded me a lot of Puma’s Nitro foam which I enjoyed a lot in their super lightweight Liberate model… and the Frequenza has the same kind of vibe for me, albeit in a way more built-up and cushioned package, which will please a greater variety of runners. At 255g for my US10.5 (which translates in EU44) it’s clearly on the lighter side for an everyday/tempo trainer, and it’s quite a feat considering that the upper does not skimp on materials to ensure comfort and foot hold. The heel is reminiscent of recent Hoka offerings, with a taper shape and a high “ending” going up the Achilles. It’s reinforced by a rigid insert that goes further on the sides to add some welcome support and works perfectly well, at least for me. The thin tongue is not gusseted but stays in place, I think thanks to the suede-like material that makes it contour. I can sense the same thickness of  the sewing  between the tongue and the upper, at the base of the laces, but it did not bother me as it did Renee. So clearly not a QC issue, but maybe not the best manufacturing choice.  Speaking of QC, and despite not being made in Italy, the Frequenza is of very good quality: suede-like overlays are well-sewn and glued to the thin and breathable upper, there are no glue spots nor hard spots. Given its price, that is expected. The upper is nicely breathable, and looks durable. Its diamond-pattern between very thin mesh and thicker one gives a very airy look to the shoe, which proves to be true. My only gripe is that the blue suede-like parts had ran on my socks during my first rainy run. Midsole & Platform Renee: The midsole is great. I rank the midsole right next to other popular trainers, including the New Balance Rebel v4, and even ZoomX from the Pegasus Turbo 2 or my beloved Skechers Hyberburst in the Razor 3.  The shoe itself is light, and the midsole is very responsive. While I didn’t run more than 10 miles in these, there’s plenty of cushion for longer runs. I’d call it a daily trainer capable of tempo paces with no issues.  The drop feels more like 10mm to me than 8mm, probably because the heel has a high collar. That said, unlike some high drop shoes (Nike Pegasus, I’m looking at you), the Frequenza is very flexible at the midfoot, making the ride nimble and light. I prefer a lower drop shoe for short intervals, but the shoe worked fine there too. For runners who like non-plated shoes for training, this is a great shoe.  Jeremy: The midsole feels squishy and bouncy, like an even bouncier version of Nitro Foam from PUMA. Due to an Achilles injury I’ve been unable to push it to my tempo paces, but recovery runs and endurance ones, around 7 min/mile for 10 mile runs  felt really great - the longest distance I’ve ran in them so far. Despite the generous cushioning and stack, the midsole stays very flexible, something that puts the Frequenza apart from let say the Nike Invincible Run 2. This allows the foot to move almost freely and still “work” despite the amount of foam underfoot. The substantial longitudinal cutout in the midsole clearly helps the flexion and transition all along the shoe’s platform. The 8mm drop feels like…an 8mm drop I’d say. With a midfoot strike and the midsole flex, I must admit that I felt running quite “naturally” in the Frequenza, not being forced to a certain footstrike or cadence in order to benefit from the shoe’s platform. My only criticism would be that the softness of the foam may impair heel stability a bit for heavy heel strikers. The noticeable bevel will help transitioning quickly to the midfoot and might minimize this anyway. Outsole Renee: The outsole has a decent amount of “soft rubber” coverage with the rest being exposed midsole. I ran on gravel, dirt, and through some light trails. I have no wear on the outsole.  Jeremy: The outsole looks rather minimal, with many cutouts and an almost rubber free mid-part, but there’s rubber where it needs to be. Like Renee I’ve gone a bit off road with the Frequenza and wasn’t worried at all be it for traction, or wear. My first run was under a pouring rain on asphalt and I had no slipping issue at all. That’s the sign of  a good outsole rubber which delivers  the goods. Ride, Conclusions and Recommendations Road Scoring Rubric Renee: The Frequenza was a great surprise. At $180, it’s a bit pricey for a trainer as compared to other comparable shoes, but it does have many positives. The shoe is light with a midsole capable of short to 20 milers (or more). The midsole is very responsive, not too firm and not mushy.  For those who like lightweight shoes with a non-plated fast ride, the Frequenza ranks up with the best options, especially for runners who prefer an 8-10 mm drop, although I personally like a lower drop shoe on a consistent basis. At times, the Frequenza’s drop combined with the high heel collar made the ride less friendly. That said, check out the comparisons below to other high drop trainers because the Frequenza beats out most of them for me in terms of a fast ride. The Frequenza does not have a super wide platform, which I enjoy for a nimble landing. I ran with the shoe on rutted dirt roads, and because it’s so light and controllable, it was stable.  Renee’s Score: 9.4/10 (-.20 price, .20 tongue issue, .-20 overbuilt heel) 😊😊😊😊😊 Jeremy: The Frequenza is a great surprise for me too. It’s on the pricer end of the trainer category but falls in the same ballpark as Saucony Triumph, Nike Invincible and so on. Considering the quality craftsmanship, the cushioning to weight ratio, and the liveliness of the midsole, I think runners looking for a nice and durable do-it-all premium trainer capable of tempo runs should not rule it out. I’ve really enjoyed the midsole and how it’s adequate for a variety of paces, from easy recovery runs to tempo ones. It never felt awkward and I found that maintaining a nice upper endurance pace, or low M-Pace was a clear sweet-spot for the Frequenza. The trend of lightweight trainers packed with super foams and no plate brings some really nice shoes lately, and this is all  for the best. Jeremy’s Score: 9.4/10 (-.30 price, .10 tongue issue, .-20 unstable heel) 😊😊😊😊😊 5 Comparisons Index to all RTR reviews: HERE  New Balance Rebel v4 (RTR Review) Renee: I complained some in my review  about the Rebel getting a wider base and less ground feel, but it’s still one of my favorite trainers. The Rebel is a light shoe (super light) with a lower drop. The Frequenza is not heavy, just heavier than the Rebel. For those who like the midsole feel of the Rebel, but need a higher drop and a narrower base, the Frequenza is an option. I still prefer the Rebel, and it’s less at $140. Sizing is comparable.  ASICS Novablast 4 (RTR Review) Renee: The Novablast feels like the same drop (both are an 8mm drop that feels like 10mm to me). The Novablast is a softer, more comforting shoe in large part as it has a much higher 40.5mm/32.5mm stack height so a full 10mm more cushion at the heel. The bounce is fun. For runners who like the ride of the Novablast, but want a lighter shoe for speed work, the Frequenza is a good option. For comfort and bounce, the Novablast is better and costs less). For a dynamic midsole ride, the Frequenza. Sizing is comparable. I find the Novablast to feel clunky for really slow runs or walking. I don’t have that issue with the Frequenza, and I think it’s because of the lighter weight.  Nike Pegasus (RTR Review) Renee: I enjoy the Pegasus Turbo 2 (not so much the Next Nature), but the regular versions of the Pegasus have always felt clunky and heavy. The midsole/ride feels inflexible under my midfoot. For runners who like a high drop and enjoy a flexible responsive ride, the Frequenza is the better option in my opinion. Sizing is comparable.  Hylo Impact (RTR Review) Jeremy: The Hylo Impact is a bit less money, and of course with its great environmental claims (proven!) it might attract you for other reasons than pure running performance. Hylo’s castor bean  based upper offers more hold but is a bit less comfy and clearly warmer.  The midsole has the same vibe, leaning on the firmer side on the Hylo and softer/bouncier on the Frequenza. It’s  a hard call between the two. Nike Invincible Flyknit Run 2 (RTR Review) Jeremy: The IR2 is less flexible as it has a higher stack, and has a different kind of bounce, more dense I’d say. It’s even more protective than the Diadora, but at the end of the day, I clearly prefer the feel of the Italian shoe. More bounce, more lively, way better foot hold. The Diadora Frequenza is available now including at our partners FLEET FEET Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Tester Profiles Renee is a former U.S. Marine journalist, which is when her enjoyment of running and writing started. She isn’t that awesome of a runner, but she tries really hard. Most of her weekly 50-60 miles take place on rural country roads in Nebraska, meaning mud, gravel, dirt, hills, and the occasional field. She has PR’s of 1:30:59 for the half marathon and 3:26:45 for the marathon. Jeremy MARIE, French, 44y/o. Running since 2013 and quickly transitioned to trails, focused on ultras since 2015 : TDS, Maxi-Race, “100 miles du Sud”, 90 kms du Mt Blanc, GRP 120 kms, Some shorter more mellow races (Saintelyon 45 kms, Ecotrail Paris 45 kms…) with always in the mix road and flat running, but not many road races. Also active cyclist and 70.3 Ironman. Recovery/easy runs ~4’45/km - 4’30/km. He has an un-official marathon PR of 2h54 (solo) and 10K PR of 36’25. He does few timed road races. Samples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased via shopping links in this article. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Comments and Questions Welcome Below! Please let us know mileage, paces, race distances, and current preferred shoes RoadTrailRun Official Store Custom Fractel Caps and Bucket Hats Cap:$39                                                             Bucket:$49 Limited Release! SHOP HERE RUNNING WAREHOUSE US Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE 2 Day Shipping EASY No Sweat Returns EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Europe only: use RTR code RTR5ALL for 5% off all products, even sale products  AUSTRALIA Men's & Women's SHOP HERE ROADRUNNERSPORTS Men's and Women's SHOP HERE REI  Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE BACKCOUNTRY Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE TOP4RUNNING EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Use RTR code RTRTOP4 for 5% off all products, even sale products SPORTSSHOES.COM UK/EU SHOP HERE Use our code RTR235 for 5% off all products MARATHON SPORTS BOSTON Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE MOOSEJAW Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE HOLABIRD SPORTS Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE Shipping on most orders over $40 AMAZON   Men's & Women's SHOP HERE WATCH OUR YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE ROADTRAILRUN CHANNEL Find all RoadTrailRun reviews at our index page HERE  Google "roadtrailrun Shoe Name" and you can be quite sure to find just about any run shoe over the last 10 years Enjoyed this post? Never miss out on future posts by Following RoadTrailRun News Feed Please Like and Follow RoadTrailRun Facebook: RoadTrailRun.com  Instagram: @roadtrailrun You Tube: @RoadTrailRun

The Zerotracer is an electric motorcycle that encloses its two occupants in a Kevlar shell and is capable of a top speed of 250 km/h (155 mph) and a range of 350km (217 miles) on a single charge.

Article by Derek Li ANTA MACH 4 (S$159 (~US$118)) ANTA is the world’s largest sports equipment manufacturer by revenue, and is the third largest manufacturer of sporting goods overall, behind Nike and Adidas. I have to admit, before the great Kenenisa Bekele signed with ANTA, I had known of the brand, but it lacked allure. Now it’s got major street credibility. Then in February I was approached by ANTA about reviewing some of their shoes, and I expressed a preference for lower stack options and the MACH 4 is what was recommended. A little background about how I came about reviewing this shoe. During my preparation for the 2022 Chicago Marathon, I started having a problem with my left hamstring, and it is an issue that I am still in the process of recovering from, some 1.5 years later. As part of the rehabilitation process, I decided I need to run less in high stack carbon-plated shoes for day-to-day training. So I’ve been looking at shoes with a little more traditional forefoot flex, and shoes that are a little lower in stack. This has been confounded by the fact that my current schedule prevents me from running doubles in training and so my single day runs tend to be longer and slower now. As it turns out, even the lower stack shoes are giving a 35mm heel stack these days and it’s hard to find suitable trainers. As it turns out, a lot of the Chinese brands, many of which are little known outside of China as they don’t sell outside of their domestic market, seem to always have a number of models that are of the lower stack variety. I dug a little more into this and found out that there is a national fitness test that college students must pass in order to graduate, and part of this test is a 50m sprint and a 1000m… well I guess it’s also a sprint to me, but the point is, there is huge demand for lower stack, more aggressive shoes for this purpose. Per ANTA’s marketing, the MACH 4 is geared toward uptempo running, city running where cornering stability is important, and for road races in the 5-21km range. Official stack: 30/24 (6mm drop) Measured stack: 33/27 including sockliner Platform Width: Forefoot 111mm, mid-foot 43mm, heel 88mm Weight for men’s US9.5 is 246g / 8.68oz Midsole firmness – Shore A 29.5 A Retail Prices at sources in Southeast Asia (see end of review): S$159 (~US$118) Pros ·       Breathable upper ·       Good vibration dampening ·       Good stability Cons ·       Can give a bottom-heavy feel at faster paces Upper and Fit The upper uses a dual layer synthetic mesh for the most part. At the toe box, there is a denser inner mesh overlaid by a perforated thinner outer layer. This is rounded off by an internal toe guard at the front. At midfoot, the mesh transitions to a single layer external mesh, reinforced by webbing that is attached to the lace eyelets on either side of the foot (coined A-WEB).  There are 5 rows of eyes that span the midfoot to the ankle opening, not counting the extra eyelet for heel-lock lacing.  The tongue is moderately padded and adopts a gusseted design to further add reinforcement to the midfoot.  The heel area is relatively conventional with moderate padding around a semi-rigid internal heel cup.  The shoe adopts the upward swoop at the heel, to reduce irritation of the Achilles insertion there. The stock sockliner is made of traditional EVA as far as I can tell. Overall, the fit is fairly traditional and should fit the vast majority of feet quite well. My initial step in feel was quite comfortable. The materials are not overly stiff and it was quite easy to lock down the foot with medium thickness socks. The overall fit sits closer to that of a daily trainer than a snug race/workout type of shoe for me, which suits me just fine for my purposes.  The fit is true to size, and walking around you can appreciate the subtle bounciness of the foam underfoot. The shoe feels very stable, courtesy of the lower stack and fairly anatomical width of the toebox and heel. Aesthetically, I think the shoe looks.. OK. It’s not the most eye-catching of designs, and in truth the whole outsole/midsole interface looks overly complicated to me, but for the price point it competes in, I think it’s fine. Midsole The midsole uses a single density of their NitroEdge foam, which is touted as a nitrogen infused foam with an 82.8% energy return. Visually, this foam looks like it is pellet-based, so while it is nitrogen infused, it is more likely to be a TPU-based foam.  This is actually my first encounter with a nitrogen-infused TPU foam, as most of the time it is EVA or PEBA that is nitrogen infused. The foam is reinforced with a purple  W-shaped plastic cage (Coined Launch Zone; see image below) that mostly wraps the bottom half of the midsole, reducing lateral torque, and also gives the shoe some a little bit of extra rigidity through the toe box, though I must emphasize that the shoe still flexes quite well through the toes.  Source: ANTA The overall underfoot sensation is that of a denser type of rebound typical of TPU-based foams. As with many other TPU-based foams, don’t expect it to be super soft, but do expect very good resilience and longevity with this type of foam. Outsole The outsole here is a relatively soft rubber compound, with a 3D-spike-like outsole pattern for added grip. Although the rubber feels soft (and this adds a lot to underfoot comfort and the overall flexibility of the shoe), I have found it to be very durable with minimal wear showing on the outsole after over 100km of running. Ride and Conclusions The Good: ·       Very good vibration dampening for the stack height. ·       The nylon cage gives the shoe a nice snappiness at faster paces ·       Very stable ride despite the lack of traditional stability elements The Bad: ·       The shoe has a bit of a bottom-heavy feel during workouts; this seems to be something I feel more of with TPU-based foams. ·       Could be a one-off anomaly, but the sockliner in the right shoe began riding up the heel out of the shoe for me on the third run, and I had to glue it down with some contact cement after that. Strangely, I had no such issues with the left shoe and haven’t had to glue the sockliner down. As far as I know, no other testers have reported this anomaly. I think this is a very good all-rounded daily trainer for people looking for a lower drop, more traditional shoe.  The ride is by no means harsh, and at its attractive price point, would be a viable option for novice runners looking for a do-it-all type of shoe that can handle daily runs and some faster workouts.  I think the arch structure is low enough that people with low arches should fit the shoe well, but if you have overly wide feet, I think the shoe might not fit so well for you, as the upper tends not to stretch so much in this model. In terms of ride,  I think this shoe is closest in terms of underfoot cushioning to an Adidas Adios 6 (I didn’t test any of the later Adios models), or even the earlier Adidas Adizero Pro (the predecessor to the Adios Pro 1) though there is more flex in this shoe than the Adizero Pro. Another shoe that comes to mind is the Saucony Ride 13. Even though the Ride 13 was significantly heavier than the ANTA MACH 4, both shoes have very nice traditional rides and yet have excellent vibration dampening despite not having very high stack numbers. By way of comparison, the OG ASICS Metaspeed Edge has the same heel stack as the ANTA MACH 4 at a measured 33mm including sockliner, and the MACH 4 feels way more cushioned. Derek’s Score: 8.83 / 10  Ride 8.5 (50%) Fit 9 (30%) Value 9.5 (15%) Style 8.5 (5%) Smiles 😊😊😊1/2  4 Comparisons Adidas Adios 6 (RTR Review) I wear US9.5 in both shoes. Both shoes are quite similar when it comes down to stack numbers and weight. The Adios 6 feels more even in terms of weight distribution, but the midsole is firmer and a bit more slappy. I would say the Adios 6 has a slightly better upper lockdown. Overall, in terms of cushioning, the ANTA MACH 4 is better, but if I were doing workouts, the Adios 6 feels a bit more responsive. I understand the Adios 6 is several years old, but I haven’t bought any of the newer Adios models as the upper heel construct does not look like something I would enjoy. New Balance Fuel Cell Rebel v4 (RTR Review) I wear US9.5 in both shoes. The Rebel 4 is a noticeably lighter shoe, with the same stack numbers. That said, I do find that the MACH 4 is just a little bit springier underfoot so the ride is a little livelier. Both shoes fit me very well. I would say the Rebel has a slightly wider fit if you need it. Between the two shoes, I find the MACH 4 to have a snappier ride through the toes, because of the plastic cage, and maybe a denser midsole. For easy runs, it is pretty much a wash. For faster runs, I think the MACH 4 is just a little bit better at holding pace. The MACH 4 comes in a bit cheaper than the Rebel 4 for what it’s worth. Nike ZoomX Streakfly (RTR Review) I wear US9.5 in both shoes. The Streakfly is a more pricey shoe, and is significantly softer due to the ZoomX foam, and actually bottoms out quite a lot for my running style, so it feels harsher than the MACH 4. I think for track workouts, the Streakfly would be a better option as it is lighter and nimbler, but for road workouts, the MACH 4 just has superior cushioning and vibration dampening. Saucony Kinvara 14 (RTR Review) I wear US9.5 in both shoes. The K14 feels quite firm underfoot despite having mostly exposed foam on the outsole. The MACH 4 is softer and springier, but is also about almost 2 ounces heavier. I think the MACH 4 has superior vibration dampening and is just a better all-rounder for most people. Incidentally, in my size the stack comparisons are MACH 4 33/27 vs Kinvara 14 32/28 so quite close. Available in Southeast Asia Singapore https://sg.anta.com/pages/mach4-0 Shopee (Singapore) https://shp.ee/p6zh2n6 Malaysia https://my.anta.com/pages/mach-4-0 Shopee (Malaysia) https://shopee.com.my/antaofficial.os Philippines https://www.anta.ph/ Shopee (Philippines) https://shopee.ph/antaofficial.ph Thailand https://shopee.co.th/antathailandsp71 Vietnam https://anta.com.vn/ Tester Profile Derek is in his 40’s and trains 70-80 miles per week at 7 to 8 minute pace in mostly tropical conditions in Singapore. He has a 2:39 marathon PR from the 2022 Zurich Marathon. Samples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased via shopping links in this article. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Comments and Questions Welcome Below! Please let us know mileage, paces, race distances, and current preferred shoes RoadTrailRun Official Store Custom Fractel Caps and Bucket Hats Cap:$39                                                             Bucket:$49 Limited Release! SHOP HERE RUNNING WAREHOUSE US Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE 2 Day Shipping EASY No Sweat Returns EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Europe only: use RTR code RTR5ALL for 5% off all products, even sale products  AUSTRALIA Men's & Women's SHOP HERE ROADRUNNERSPORTS Men's and Women's SHOP HERE FLEET FEET Men's & Women's SHOP HERE TOP4RUNNING EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Use RTR code RTRTOP4 for 5% off all products, even sale products SPORTSSHOES.COM UK/EU SHOP HERE Use our code RTR235 for 5% off all products MARATHON SPORTS BOSTON Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE HOLABIRD SPORTS Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE Shipping on most orders over $40 AMAZON   Men's & Women's SHOP HERE WATCH OUR YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE ROADTRAILRUN CHANNEL Find all RoadTrailRun reviews at our index page HERE  Google "roadtrailrun Shoe Name" and you can be quite sure to find just about any run shoe over the last 10 years Enjoyed this post? Never miss out on future posts by Following RoadTrailRun News Feed Please Like and Follow RoadTrailRun Facebook: RoadTrailRun.com  Instagram: @roadtrailrun You Tube: @RoadTrailRun

A blog about the best creativity and design in the world.

Un road trip en Namibie vous conduit forcément à la découverte de Sossusvlei, un désert de gigantesques dunes de sable qui culminent pour certaines à plus de 300 mètres de hauteur.

Supreme puff jacket. Barely worn, have more photos Supreme jacket Supreme Jackets & Coats Puffers

Boost your confidence this autumn with 7 powerful affirmations. Embrace the changing season and harness the positive energy of fall.

Recumbent and Human Powered Vehicle Information Center

Vintage NOS Champion NCC Angle Winder Slot Car……. NOS slot car as shown,see photos for details,buyer pays $10.00 S/H this is a sold as is auction thanks for looking........ NOS slot car as shown,see photos for details,buyer pays $10.00 S/H this is a sold as is auction thanks for looking........

We chose the running shoes we can't live without out on the pavement.

Whether you’re an experienced runner or a total novice, we help you pick the best running shoes with bite-size reviews and a buying guide

Article by Renee Krusemark Rabbit Dream Chaser ($160) Introduction The Dream Chaser is Rabbit's first running shoe “inspired by the belief that all runners deserve the best technology.” The “best” includes sustainable fibers and foams with a patent-pending midfoot Carbon Trax technology. The shoe launched in the Boston colorway during the 2024 race weekend. Does the quality of the brand’s apparel transcend into its first running shoe?  Pros: Quality, stylish, comfortable upper material: Renee Doubles as a casual and easy-day run shoe: Renee Excellent vibration dampening eTPU foam Targeted at the ground midfoot support/stability from the Carbon Trax plate Cons: Weight: Renee Midfoot can feel rigid/inflexible due to carbon plates: Renee Most comparable shoes Saucony Ride 17  Brooks Glycerin 21 ASICS Novablast 4 New Balance FuelCell Propel v4 Stats Estimated Weight: men's 10.3 oz  / 292g (US9)  /  women's 9.31 oz/ 264g(US8)   Samples: men’s  10.11oz / 286g US ,  oz / g US                   women’s 9.31 oz/ 264g US8  Stack Height: 32mm heel / 27mm forefoot Platform Width: 95mm heel / 82mm midfoot / 110mm forefoot $160 Available from Rabbit HERE First Impressions, Fit and Upper Renee: rabbit’s first running shoe is here, and it’s totally understandable to question if the new Dream Chaser is a legit running shoe. Is the shoe a casual shoe marketed as a runner? Or a legit running shoe that doubles as a casual shoe? Can it be the best of both worlds? The truth is in the middle. No surprise is the Dream Chaser is a pretty shoe in the Boston colorway. The knit upper features minimal layers of 100% recycled polyester. As rabbit states, the upper is as “comfortable as it is premium.”  Like the brand’s apparel, the Dream Chaser has a tailored fit for each gender. I can’t compare my women’s Dream Chaser to the men’s version. Both versions of the shoe are stated to have a secure heel, snug midfoot, and spacious forefoot. For the women’s version, I found this to be the case.  The high heel collar is not my favorite in any shoe, but the foot opening and heel are secure (i.e. relatively narrow), despite the shoe’s heavy weight.  The midfoot hold is good. The lacing system doesn’t tighten super securely across the midfoot or forefoot, but the fit works well for the shoe’s easy-run focus. For speed work, I’d prefer a more secure fit, but I don’t think the shoe is meant for those types of paces. For strides, the shoe is just as fine as any other shoe in the same category. The volume and width in the midfoot and forefoot are great. The upper material has stretch without being sloppy.  For runner’s with bone spurs or bunions on the top of the foot or big toe, the fit will be good.  RTR Editor Sam demonstrates bunion area stretch! The heel has some padding to reduce slippage. The tongue is minimally padded and thin, but fits comfortably across the foot. I had no issues with upper comfort during testing, running between 9 and 20 milers in the Dream Chaser. All of my miles were in the early morning during cool temperatures (40-50℉). The upper allows some air to the forefoot, but it’s not super breathable.  For sizing, I suggest true-to- size. For runner’s between half sizes, I suggest the longer for running purposes and the shorter if purchasing for casual use.  Midsole & Platform Renee: The Blumaka insole is 85% recycled ETPU (we love TPU insoles!). The insole is “contoured,” which to me refers to the high arch design.  The midsole itself also features a ETPU foam along with  Carbon Trax technology (the two flat strips visible from the outsole).  The brand states the foam is “lightweight,” “bouncy,” and “controlled.” The shoe is not lightweight.  At 9.31 oz is a women’s size 8, the shoe is heavier than even most of my trail shoes. The shoe feels lighter underfoot than the actual weight, but it’s still heavy. More on all of that in the Ride section.  Because of the high insole arch and the Carbon Trax strips, my foot wasn’t able to naturally flex during my 20-mile run. I had some irritation at around 2 hours into that run under my arch. For shorter runs, my shortest run with the shoes was 9 miles, I had no issues.  Outsole Renee: The outsole features “slip-resistant” 15% recycled rubber. I didn’t test during wet conditions, but the outsole worked well on gravel. Aside from some color chipping off, the outsole looks great after 50 miles. I thought the exposed carbon fiber plates would crack over my gravel terrain/roads, but have had no issues as of yet.  The mid section of the outsole is exposed midsole, but even that is holding up well after running gravel. While the carbon strips are visible from the outsole (and therefore sit well below the foot), they do affect the feel and ride of the shoe. More on that in the next section.  Update from Rabbit: We have made a slight modification to the outsole for the production shoes by adding rubber strips across the Carbon Trax to: -Eliminate the echo of the carbon -Protect the carbon plates -Offer a more enjoyable running experience This minor design change will improve the shoe’s performance, reduce sound, and protect the carbon plates, addressing the main feedback from our soft launch. These updates will be featured in our upcoming June launch, now scheduled for June 20. Ride, Conclusions and Recommendations Renee: The ride is smooth, and during my first run (9 easy miles with strides), I was surprised at how the shoes felt lighter than the actual weight. The midsole and carbon fiber rod technology were apparent.  So, yes, it’s a pretty shoe that is great for casual wear, but it has some legit running qualities . . . with some limitations. I don’t find the ride bouncy or responsive, just smooth and protective. While running strides in the shoes felt fine, I won’t choose it for tempo or speed work. The Carbon Trax strips (visible from the outsole) give some control without being a “stability” shoe.  That said, about 2 hours into my 20 mile run, I had some “hot spots” under my arches. The carbon fiber strips give control and stability, but at the cost of not allowing the natural flex of my arch. I’m guessing this might only be an issue for mid to forefoot strikers. For my shorter runs (less than 2 hours), I had no issues.  I’d suggest the Dream Chaser as a shoe for easy runs and as a casual/walking shoe. The shoe is pretty and it’s comfortable overall for walking and easy/short(ish) runs. I’d love to see rabbit release other colorways, and they are coming . For strictly running purposes, I’d choose other options, but the style factor gives the Dream Chase an edge.  Renee’s Score: 8.8/10 (-.60 heavy, -.30 limited to easy paces and short to mid distances, -.30 rigid under arch) 4 Comparisons Index to all RTR reviews: HERE Saucony Ride 17 (RTR Review) Renee: The Ride 17 gained a bit of weight from the previous version along with a wider base. The Ride 17 is a lighter shoe than the Dream Chaser. In terms of stack height and platform width, the shoes are similar. The Ride 17 has the advantage in terms of running performance. For casual use or daily walking, I prefer the upper and underfoot feel of the Dream Chaser, which could be because of the lower drop. Sizing is comparable.  Brooks Glycerin 21 (RTR Review) Renee: For me, both shoes are better for daily comfort, casual use, or walking as compared to running. The Glycerin 21 is lighter in weight, although both shoes run about the same in terms of performance. The midsole of the Glycerin is much softer and plusher as compared to the firm midsole of the Dream Chase. Sizing is comparable.  ASICS Novablast 4 (RTR Review) Renee: If you want bouncy, go with the Novablast 4. The current Novablast gained some weight and a wider platform as compared to the previous version. The width and stack are comparable to the Dream Chaser. The Novablast 4 has a higher drop and more “fun” underfoot for running because of the bounce. The low drop and firmer midsole of the Dream Chase make it better for a casual shoe. Sizing is comparable.  New Balance FuelCell Propel v4 (RTR Review) Renee: The Propel v4 is a $110 shoe, so bonus points for its cost. The upper, as a $110 shoe, is clearly less stylish and less plush as compared to the Dream Chaser’s. The underfoot ride in both shoes is similar. Neither are lightweight shoes, although the Propel V4 is lighter. For running, I’d choose the Propel v4; for style, the Dream Chaser. Sizing is comparable.  Rabbit Presents the Dream Chaser at their Boston Marathon Pop Up Shop The Dream Chaser for men and women is available from Rabbit HERE Tester Profile Renee is a former U.S. Marine journalist, which is when her enjoyment of running and writing started. She isn’t that awesome of a runner, but she tries really hard. Most of her weekly 50-60 miles take place on rural country roads in Nebraska, meaning mud, gravel, dirt, hills, and the occasional field. She has PR’s of 1:30:59 for the half marathon and 3:26:45 for the marathon. Samples were provided at no charge for review purposes. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased via shopping links in this article. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the authors'. Comments and Questions Welcome Below! Please let us know mileage, paces, race distances, and current preferred shoes RoadTrailRun Official Store Custom Fractel Caps and Bucket Hats Cap:$39                                                             Bucket:$49 Limited Release! SHOP HERE RUNNING WAREHOUSE US Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE 2 Day Shipping EASY No Sweat Returns EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Europe only: use RTR code RTR5ALL for 5% off all products, even sale products  AUSTRALIA Men's & Women's SHOP HERE ROADRUNNERSPORTS Men's and Women's SHOP HERE FLEET FEET Men's & Women's SHOP HERE REI  Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE BACKCOUNTRY Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE TOP4RUNNING EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE Use RTR code RTRTOP4 for 5% off all products, even sale products SPORTSSHOES.COM UK/EU SHOP HERE Use our code RTR235 for 5% off all products MARATHON SPORTS BOSTON Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE MOOSEJAW Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE HOLABIRD SPORTS Men's & Women's SHOP HERE FREE Shipping on most orders over $40 AMAZON   Men's & Women's SHOP HERE NEW BALANCE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE SAUCONY Men's and Women's SHOP HERE SALOMON RUNNING Men's and Women's SHOP HERE WATCH OUR YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE ROADTRAILRUN CHANNEL Find all RoadTrailRun reviews at our index page HERE  Google "roadtrailrun Shoe Name" and you can be quite sure to find just about any run shoe over the last 10 years Enjoyed this post? Never miss out on future posts by Following RoadTrailRun News Feed Please Like and Follow RoadTrailRun Facebook: RoadTrailRun.com  Instagram: @roadtrailrun You Tube: @RoadTrailRun

PRICES MAY VARY. Lightweight yet extremely durable Made of leather and synthetic Thin sole the grips great Padded liner for extra ankle support Perfect for training, wrestling, mma, martial arts, weightlifting, and bodybuilding OTOMIX brings its heritage of mat sports experience in Martial Arts to the world of Wrestling, MMA, Grappling with the introduction of the MMA Stingray Escape shoe. These ultra light shoes provide superior support and stability with unlimited range of motion. The MMA Stingray Escape is feather light with ultimate traction for competition. Ideal for all grappling sports, jujitsu, judo, boxing, wrestling, and Mixed Martial Arts.

Große Auswahl neuer und gebrauchter Bootsport-Ausstattung online entdecken bei eBay.

It's easy to realize you have a problem — but to come up with a way to fix that problem is another matter entirely. And while I love guessing whether an entrepreneur will get a deal with their brilliant problem-solving products, it's pretty doubtful…

The ultimate intersection of luxury and performance, the APL TechLoom Bliss running shoe travels with you from the gym to the street and through all aspects of your life.

Perhaps you're here because our last years visiting day list was such a smash hit, or maybe you're a new camp parent! Either way, welcome newbs and pros - one and all. The bad news about sleepaway camps is that they are all currently the same price as private schools in most non urban environs,