Oil Painting, An Old Woman Spinning Silk, by Margaret Sarah Carpenter, ca. 1816.
Wadsworth Atheneum’s American Art collection contains 1,000 paintings, 400 sculptures, and 4,000 works on paper. Search the collection or see highlights.
Portrait miniature of an unknown woman, ca. 1780, a pair to Evans.167, watercolour on ivory, painted by Jeremiah Meyer, R.A. (1735-1789).
Artist: Gilbert Stuart (American, North Kingston, Rhode Island 1755–1828 Boston, Massachusetts). Date: ca. 1795–98. Culture: American. Medium: Oil on ca...
The Wiley Family - William Williams, 1771. William Williams was an English/American painter who wrote a novel, The Journal of Penrose, Seaman, considered by many to be the first American novel.
Portrait miniature of an unknown woman - unfinished, watercolour on ivory, painted by Jeremiah Meyer, R.A. (1735-1789).
This painting of a Connecticut clockmaker’s wife was meant to hang to the right of her husband’s portrait, preserving their images and values for subsequent generations.
When applied to women's fashion, the French term redingote is typically translated as robe. So this white dress is a morning robe ("Redingote du Matin"). The addition of the bonnet makes it an outdoor morning ensemble, or a morning walking dress.
Portrait miniature of Juliet Wackrill, possibly George Place, ca.1797
So many reenactresses wear fingerless mitts. Like pretty much everyone I know. Living in New England, why are we freezing our fingertips off? Can't we wear gloves? Last spring when I was researching local staymakers I noticed this ad promoting gloves... Newport Mercury, 1764 Purple gloves? Yes! Digging deeper in the newspaper archives, the Mortons were not the only merchants in town selling "gloves"... Newport Mercury, October 17, 1758 Richardson & Goldthwait advertised, "men's and women's lamb gloves and mitts." King and Hagger promote "Mens and Womens Gloves" in the Newport Mercury on May 22, 1759. Mr. Goldthwait promoted his "women's gloves and mitts" in this July 11, 1763 ad in the Newport Mercury. Near and dear to my heart, the Wanton brothers advertised selling "Men's and women's lamb glaz'd gloves" in the Newport Mercury on October 22, 1764. (This is the father and uncle of the young woman I often portray.) This is just a selection of ads, there are many, many more. So is the 18th century idea of "gloves" the same as our modern idea? Am I missing some secret reason why no one wears gloves? I've found a few prints to help answer this... Miss Harriote, mid 18th century National Portrait Gallery UK, Accession Number NPG D2573 One glove on the chair and she's putting the other on. Looks relatively comparable to a modern glove. Note: the seam around her left thumb. Winter, 1753-1766 British Museum Accession Number 2010,7081.491 Gloves and a muff--smart woman! An English Man of War taking a French Privateer, 1781 The British Museum Accession Number 1935,0522.1.66 Green gloves! No evidence of buttons on the inside of her wrist. Miss Tipapin Going for All Nine, 1779 British Museum Accession Number 2010,7081.3017 The woman in the middle ground wearing the stellar bonnet also has green gloves. I have not yet had a chance to explore museum databases to see if there are any extant gloves, but it seems safe to conclude that we are under representing gloves in our living history work. I hope to make / buy a pair this year once the furlow / sequestration situation is resolved.
